Skip to main content

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

/docs/America 250 Ohio (1776-2026) Logo

America commemorated its 250th birthday on July 4, 2026, marking a historic milestone in the nation's journey.

To honor the semiquincentennial, the Court hosted a year-long celebration titled "The Story of America," highlighting significant historical events that shaped both the nation and Ohio. In addition to digital content, the initiative features special events and exhibits at the Court. The celebration aims to spark curiosity, strengthen civic literacy, and recognize pivotal moments in American and Ohio history. Learn More.

America 250: Ohio Courts Survey 







Daily Case Announcements
& Opinions GovDelivery

September 1, 2026

State ex rel. Blankenship v. Trenton City Council


In State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ordered the relator to file a response, if she chooses, by noon, Wednesday, Sept. 2, to the respondent’s motion to file amended answer.


In State ex rel. Blankenship v. Trenton City Council, the Court ordered Trenton City Council to submit to city voters a proposed city charter amendment that would prohibit the construction of data centers.


In State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court set a schedule for the filing of the answer, evidence, and briefs.


State ex rel Howard v. Sackett


The Court accepted State v. Bryant for review.


In State ex rel. Howard v. Sackett, the Court ordered the Lake Erie Correctional Institution to pay a northeast Ohio inmate $4,000 in statutory damages for failing to comply with the Ohio Public Records Act.


August 31, 2026

In State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ordered the respondent to file a response, if it chooses, by noon, Tuesday. Sept. 1 to the relator’s emergency motion to strike respondent’s August 28, 2026, filing or, alternatively, to enforce the briefing sequence established by Rule 12.08(A).


The Court published official versions of 13 opinions, which were previously released as slip opinions.


August 28, 2026

The Court dismissed State v. Craft.


August 27, 2026

Allied Health & Chiropractic, L.L.C. v. State


Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Doberdruk


State ex rel. Wright v. Franklin Cty. Mun. Court


In Allied Health & Chiropractic, L.L.C. v. State, the Court ruled that two laws, which were passed in the state budget bill, then amended later, are not unconstitutional for violating the “one-subject rule.”


August 26, 2026

State v. Fontanez


State ex rel. Ames v. Revere Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.


In State v. Fontanez, the Court ruled that, absent a criminal defendant’s assertion of actual innocence of a charge, a trial court can presume the defendant understands that pleading guilty is a complete admission of guilt to the crime.


In State v. Fontanez, the Court ruled that, absent a criminal defendant’s assertion of actual innocence of a charge, a trial court can presume the defendant understands that pleading guilty is a complete admission of guilt to the crime.


The Court dismissed State v. Carter.


The Court dismissed State v. Carter.


August 25, 2026

The Court released the following case announcement.


In All Foils, Inc. v. Kulik, the Court denied the appellants’ request to stay the judgment of the court of appeals.


In State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ordered the respondent to file an answer to the complaint by Friday, Aug. 28.


State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.


Drushal v. Miller


In Drushal v. Miller, the Court permitted a couple to challenge a court judgment that ordered real estate they owned to be taken to satisfy the debts of another couple who was buying that land through a “land contract.”


August 21, 2026

In State ex rel. Thompson v. Swenski, the Court denied the relator’s request for a stay of a court order.


State ex rel. Standen v. N. Ridgeville


State ex rel. Bowling v. DeWine


In State ex rel. Standen v. N. Ridgeville, the Court rejected a request to reopen a dispute regarding the amount of money owed to Lorain County landowners whose road access was cut off to build a new roundabout.


Word files may be viewed for free with Office Online.

PDF Files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the Free Acrobat® Reader. Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Inc.