|
|
Allen v. Sidney
| 2026-00233PQ | On objections, the court overruled respondent’s objections to a special master’s report and recommendation; held that intervenor-respondent’s partial joinder was improper; and overruled requester’s objections to the report and recommendation. The court adopted the report and recommendation and held that requester was entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee and any other costs associated with the action that had been incurred by requester, excepting attorney fees. The court assessed court costs to respondent. In accordance with the special master’s recommendation, the court denied all other relief requested by the parties. | Sadler | |
8/31/2026
|
10/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3868 |
|
Pryor v. Ohio State Univ.
| 2022-00044JD | Civ.R. 56(C), Summary Judgment, Assault and Battery, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Negligent Supervision, Negligent Retention, Negligent Infliction of Emotion Distress. Plaintiff brought claims of vicarious liability for assault and battery, negligence, negligent supervision, negligent retention, and negligent infliction of emotional distress stemming from allegations of sexual misconduct by defendant’s former employee. After the court determined that the former employee’s actions fell outside the scope of his employment with defendant and that no genuine issue as to any material fact existed regarding plaintiff’s claims, the court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. | Cain | |
8/28/2026
|
9/21/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3685 |
|
Cummins v. Ohio Secy. of State
| 2026-00200PQ | On objections, the court overruled requester’s five objections to a special master’s report and recommendation; adopted the report and recommendation; dismissed requester’s complaint without prejudice; denied, as moot, all outstanding motions; and assessed court costs to requester. | Sadler | |
8/25/2026
|
10/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3866 |
|
Hobbs v. Warren Cty. Emergency Serv.
| 2026-00331PQ | On objections, the court overruled requester’s objections to a special master’s report and recommendation; adopted the report and recommendation; dismissed the case; denied, as moot, respondent’s motion to dismiss; denied requester’s motion to strike; granted requester’s motion to resubmit evidence; and assessed court costs to requester. | Sadler | |
8/25/2026
|
10/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3869 |
|
Lee v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
| 2025-00895JD | Negligence, Slip and Fall, Open and Obvious Doctrine. The magistrate found that plaintiff failed to prove by the preponderance of evidence his claim for negligence because the puddle of water that plaintiff slipped on was open and obvious. Additionally, plaintiff failed to argue or present evidence that attendant circumstances existed such that the open and obvious doctrine would not apply. The magistrate recommended judgment be entered in favor of defendant. | Peterson | |
8/14/2026
|
9/21/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3688 |
|