|
|
State v. Logan
| 115240 | Criminal law; guilty plea; waiver; subject-matter jurisdiction; indictment; facial validity; motion to suppress; drug trafficking; drug possession; possessing criminal tools; forfeiture; controlled purchase; confidential informant; search warrant; arrest warrant; crack cocaine; fentanyl; heroin; methamphetamine; Crim.R. 11; nonjurisdictional defects; due process; Fourteenth Amendment; prosecutorial misconduct; Ohio Const., art. I, § 10; abuse of discretion; plea colloquy; concurrent sentences; postrelease control. Appellant entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty plea to multiple drug-related offenses. The appellant waived all nonjurisdictional defects in prior proceedings, including challenges to subject-matter jurisdiction based on alleged facial invalidity of the indictment, denial of a pretrial motion to suppress, claims of prosecutorial misconduct in presenting the indictment, and alleged violations of the State constitution. Judgment of the trial court affirmed. | Laster Mays | Cuyahoga |
6/4/2026
|
6/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2076 |
|
In re Ju.G.
| 115335 | Permanent custody; failure to protect children; ineffective assistance of counsel; weight of the evidence; criminal conviction; interpreter services. Judgment affirmed. The trial court’s judgment granting permanent custody of mother’s four children was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The record demonstrates that mother failed to protect her children and she failed to remedy that concern throughout the case. Evidence of criminal conviction of one of mother’s boyfriends was conclusive proof of his sexual molestation of one of mother’s children. Mother failed to demonstrate that her counsel was ineffective. The record demonstrates that mother had meaningful interpretation services throughout the proceedings. | Ryan | Cuyahoga |
6/4/2026
|
6/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2077 |
|
Papp v. Cuyahoga Cty.
| 115346 | Civ.R. 56; summary judgment; hostile work environment; sexual harassment; putative class. Affirmed. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment on the individual claims of hostile work environment or intentional infliction of emotional distress because the evidence was undisputed that the County instituted a reasonable remedial measure to deter inmate misconduct directed toward female correction officers working in the local Jail. | S. Gallagher | Cuyahoga |
6/4/2026
|
6/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2078 |
|
Loomis v. O'Neill Healthcare - Middleburg Hts.
| 115372 | Arbitration; arbitration agreement; nursing home; ability; comprehend; read; blind; R.C. 2711.23; R.C. 2711.24; unconscionable. - Trial court did not err in finding the nursing home arbitration agreement unconscionable and thus unenforceable. The evidence proved that the nursing home patient would not have been able to read or comprehend the agreement based on her medical and mental conditions. The evidence further established that the arbitration agreement did not comply with R.C. 2711.23 and 2711.24. | Keough | Cuyahoga |
6/4/2026
|
6/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2079 |
|
Murman v. WP Operating
| 115456 | Arbitration; arbitration agreement; motion to compel; R.C. 2711.01; R.C. 2711.23; medical claims; skilled-nursing facilities; statutory interpretation. Judgment affirmed. The singular arbitration provision contained within the parties’ 16 page admission’s agreement is unenforceable. Specifically, the arbitration provision does not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2711.23 that govern arbitration agreements between residents and skilled-nursing facilities relating to medical claims. Because the subject arbitration provision does not comply with R.C. 2711.23, the trial court did not err in denying appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. | Sheehan | Cuyahoga |
6/4/2026
|
6/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2080 |
|