|
|
State v. Davis
| 115632 | Juvenile court; probable cause; amenability; R.C. 2152.12(D); R.C. 2152.12(E); aggravated murder; felonious assault; transfer to adult court; discretionary bindover. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that appellant — who was 15 years old at the time he shot into the victims’ house, killing one victim and injuring another — was not amenable to rehabilitation in the juvenile system. | Ryan | Cuyahoga |
8/27/2026
|
8/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3338 |
|
Mattox v. S.W. Gen. Health Ctr.
| 115805 | Medical negligence; battery; consent; motion in limine; motion to amend pleadings to conform to evidence; Civ.R. 15(B); R.C. 2317.54; jury interrogatories; Civ.R. 49(B); failure to object; waiver; cumulative error. The trial court did not err in excluding any evidence of appellant’s unpled battery claim or in denying her motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence under Civ.R. 15(B). The court also did not err in the instructions or interrogatories provided to the jury, and we cannot determine where in the record appellant claimed that an error occurred with regard to the application of R.C. 2317.54. Finally, because we did not find any errors, there could be no cumulative error. | E.T. Gallagher | Cuyahoga |
8/27/2026
|
8/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3339 |
|
State v. Kane
| 115884 | Gross sexual imposition; prosecutorial misconduct; ineffective assistance of trial counsel; plain error; manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error when it allowed in the prosecutor’s statement to the jury that if it believed the victim then it should speak to the community with its verdict. Because there was no plain error, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s statements. Appellant’s conviction for gross sexual imposition was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to support his argument with citations to the record, only made unsupported conclusions, and did not develop his arguments. It is not this court’s duty to construct appellant’s arguments for him. | Ryan | Cuyahoga |
8/27/2026
|
8/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3340 |
|
Moufawad v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio
| 115983 | Administrative appeal; R.C. 119.12; Board; abuse of discretion; due process; prejudice; laches; statutory interpretation; R.C. 4731.22; Adm.Code 4731-26-01; Adm.Code 4731-26-02; sexual misconduct. The common pleas court did not act arbitrarily, unreasonably, or unconscionably or otherwise err in affirming the Board’s decision to indefinitely suspend appellant’s license to practice medicine. Appellant did not demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the delay in the investigative proceedings against him or that the doctrine of laches applied. | E.T. Gallagher | Cuyahoga |
8/27/2026
|
8/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3341 |
|
In re K.T.B.
| 116069 | Legal custody; parent and nonparent custody determination; unsuitability finding; fundamental rights; natural parents. The trial court erred in granting legal custody of a minor child to a nonparent over a parent because it did not find that the natural parent was unsuitable, abandoned the child, relinquished rights to the child, or was totally unable to care for the child. The record also supports the trial court’s factual findings that none of the above prerequisites were met, and thus the child should have been placed with the natural parent. | Keough | Cuyahoga |
8/27/2026
|
8/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3342 |
|