Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 117 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Howe F-20-008Motion to suppress was properly denied where trial court appropriately found that search of appellant’s bags was incident to her arrest on outstanding warrants. Matter remanded, however, for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc journal entry that accurately reflects that appellant entered a plea of no contest.DuhartFulton 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1676
Bliss v. Johns Manville Corp. L-20-1091Judgment reversed where trial court based denial of summary judgment on expert opinion regarding meaning of statutorily defined equipment safety guard, with determination a matter of law for the trial court.ZmudaLucas 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1673
State v. Brown L-20-1052Trial court did not err in failing to declare a mistrial based upon juror misconduct, where appellant invited the error by asking the court not to declare a mistrial and insisting upon proceeding to a verdict on the charges that were not tainted by the jury’s improper research. Appellant did not establish ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.ZmudaLucas 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1674
State v. Woodmore L-20-1088Judgment affirmed where sentence beyond the recommended prison term was not error by the trial court, where the record demonstrates appellant understood the trial court could impose a greater than recommended sentence, and the trial court’s judgment was not subject to review under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12.ZmudaLucas 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1677
In re J.S. L-20-1109Trial court did not abuse its discretion in naming appellee the residential parent and legal guardian of the parties’ minor child.ZmudaLucas 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1678
State v. Carnicom WD-20-027Conviction for violating a temporary protection order was supported by the evidence where the state established that the defendant “harassed” the victim by calling her incessantly from jail. Also, trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of other phone calls that predated the order because the calls were relevant to establishing the defendant’s criminal intent and were not prejudicial.MayleWood 5/14/2021 5/14/2021 2021-Ohio-1675
State v. Porter S-20-029Trial court erred in failing to forewarn defendant-appellant during the change of plea of the possibility of being sentenced in excess of the maximum plea agreement term of incarceration. Judgment reversed.OsowikSandusky 5/7/2021 5/7/2021 2021-Ohio-1617
State v. Johnson L-20-1164, L-20-1165Judgment affirmed where trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing appellant for probation violations in two cases, and ordering the sentences to be served consecutively.ZmudaLucas 5/7/2021 5/7/2021 2021-Ohio-1614
State v. Martin L-19-1133Judgment affirmed where weight of evidence supported aggravated robbery conviction, separate harm and animus precluded merger, and separate sentences for gang specifications proper under R.C. 2929.14(G).ZmudaLucas 5/7/2021 5/7/2021 2021-Ohio-1615
State v. Rottman L-20-1061Waiver of constitutional challenge to a statute where issue not first raised before the trial court. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.OsowikLucas 5/7/2021 5/7/2021 2021-Ohio-1618