Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 6 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Teays Valley Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Struckman 21CA7Discovery-trial court did not abuse its discretion by staying discovery when discovery would not have been fruitful given that dispositive summary judgment motion based upon res judicata remained pending; Civ.R. 15(A)-trial court did not err by determining that opposing counsel did not give written consent to amended pleading when counsel agreed to a proposed case scheduling order before scheduling conference with the court; trial court did not abuse its discretion by striking amended pleading or by denying leave to file amended pleading when amendment would be futile due to res-judicata bar; Civ.R. 56(C)-trial court did not incorrectly grant summary judgment when res-judicata and the law-of-the-case doctrine dictated the outcome of the proceedings.AbelePickaway 1/25/2023 1/27/2023 2023-Ohio-244
Emanuel's, L.L.C. v. Restore Marietta, Inc. 22CA6judgment on the pleadings, immunity, R.C. 2744.02(B)(2), R.C. 2744.02(B)(5), tortious interference with business relations, Valentine Act, monopoly, antitrust injuryHessWashington 1/17/2023 1/19/2023 2023-Ohio-147
In re F.T. 22CA17PERMANENT CUSTODY - Although a judgment rendered without proper service or entry of appearance is a nullity and void, a notice issue may be waived on appeal when a parent's attorney is present for various permanent custody hearings and does not raise the improper notice issue; Even assuming counsel's deficient performance by failing to object to the alleged lack of service, father cannot demonstrate that such supposed deficiency prejudiced him and thus, he cannot demonstrate that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for counsel's errors; a reviewing court will generally not disturb a trial court's permanent custody decision unless the decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence; because the agency presented substantial clear and convincing evidence that placing the child in its permanent custody would serve the child's best interest, the trial court's decision is not against the manifest weight of the evidence; because the agency presented substantial clear and convincing evidence that placing the child in its permanent custody would serve the child's best interest, the trial court's decision is not against the manifest weight of the evidence; R.C. 2151.419(A)(1) did not require the agency to show reasonable efforts at the permanent custody hearing unless it had not been established previously and the agency had made multiple reasonable efforts findings at the time of the hearing.SmithRoss 1/12/2023 1/24/2023 2023-Ohio-191
State v. Allen 21CA3969CRIMINAL - The trial court's decision denying defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable and therefore the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion; the trial court reasonably applied controlling case law to find a violation of R.C. 4511.33(A)(1) occurred where the defendant's vehicle crossed over the fog line by a half a tire width and therefore the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.SmithScioto 1/12/2023 1/24/2023 2023-Ohio-192
State v. Ruggles 21CA1138Unlawful sexual conduct with a minor; cross-examination of state’s witnesses of their sexual orientation; victim-impact evidence; constitutional right to equal protection; constitutional right to confront witnesses; ineffective assistance of counsel; abuse of discretion; plain error; relevant evidence; probative value; unfair prejudice; Evid.R. 401, 402, 403, 611(B), 614(A), 616(A); R.C. 2907.04(A)WilkinAdams 1/4/2023 1/10/2023 2023-Ohio-54
State v. Midlam 22CA7CRIMINAL - The trial court's denial of a motion for judicial release is not a final appealable order therefore the appeal is dismissed.SmithHighland 1/4/2023 1/11/2023 2023-Ohio-62