Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 115 rows. Rows per page:

State v. Spiegel

5-26-05 & 5-26-06

Reimbursement. Trial court did not err by ordering extra $100 in reimbursement.

Waldick

Hancock

7/27/2026

2026-Ohio-2871

State v. McKenzie

1-25-67

Second Amendment; Weapons Under Disability; R.C. 2923.13(A)(2); R.C. 2923.13(A)(3); Facial Constitutional Challenge; As-Applied Constitutional Challenge; Plain Error; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Opinion Testimony; Sufficiency of the Evidence; Manifest Weight of the Evidence. Ohio’s weapons-under-disability statute, R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) and (A)(3), is not facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment because the legislature may constitutionally disarm individuals who have committed inherently dangerous crimes. The statute is constitutional as applied to the defendant-appellant because his prior convictions for burglary and felony drug offenses establish a presumption of dangerousness justifying his disarmament. The defendant-appellant’s conviction for having weapons while under disability was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The defendant-appellant’s trial counsel was not ineffective.

Zimmerman

Allen

7/27/2026

2026-Ohio-2869

Blake v. Blake

17-26-01

R.C. 1701.91; Judicial dissolution of corporations; Civ.R. 56; Summary judgment. The judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, on a claim seeking corporate dissolution of a corporation pursuant to R.C. 1701.91, is affirmed.

Waldick

Shelby

7/27/2026

2026-Ohio-2872

WIN Waste Innovations of Seneca Cty., L.L.C. v. Washington Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

5-25-28

Administrative appeals; R.C. 2506.04; Zoning. The trial court erred in determining that the board of zoning appeals erred in finding that the project sought to be constructed by the plaintiff-appellee was a borrow-pit and not a pond or a lake.

Waldick

Hancock

7/27/2026

2026-Ohio-2870

State v. Brown

1-25-34

Drug Possession; Constructive Possession; Felony Sentencing; Consecutive Sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c). The defendant-appellant's drug possession convictions are supported by sufficient evidence establishing his constructive possession of the contraband. The trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences based on the defendant's prior criminal record and unsuccessful termination from community control.

Zimmerman

Allen

7/20/2026

2026-Ohio-2752

...