Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 79 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re R.R. 8-20-26The trial court did not err in granting the Agency’s motion for permanent custody. ShawLogan 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1620
Miles v. Cummins 8-20-44Riding an ATV is an recreational activity. Thus, under the recreational activity doctrine, the driver or passenger of an ATV is liable for reckless conduct. Liability does not lie for the negligent operation of an ATV if the recreational activity doctrine applies.WillamowskiLogan 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1621
In re J.G. 8-20-59The trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a blended sentence and ordering restitution. ShawLogan 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1624
Baber v. Ohio Mut. Ins. Co. 17-20-10The trial court did not err by granting defendant-appellee's motion for summary judgment.MillerShelby 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1625
State v. Hiles 14-20-21Because defendant-appellant’s involuntary-manslaughter conviction is a qualifying felony of the first degree under the Reagan Tokes Law, defendant-appellant’s indefinite 8-12 year prison term is not contrary to law. Furthermore, because the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences and those findings are supported by the record, defendant-appellant’s consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.MillerUnion 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1622
State v. Reed 14-20-16The record demonstrates that the prison terms imposed by the trial court in this case are within the statutory range and that the trial court considered the statutory factors in R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 when it fashioned Reed’s aggregate sentence. Thus, Reed’s sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, and it must therefore be affirmed.ShawUnion 5/10/2021 5/10/2021 2021-Ohio-1623
In re Estate of Damschroder 13-20-19The trial court did not err in denying the petition for declaratory judgment. ShawSeneca 5/3/2021 5/3/2021 2021-Ohio-1558
State v. Rollison 9-20-41The defendant-appellant's aggravated-vehicular-homicide conviction is based on sufficient evidence.ZimmermanMarion 5/3/2021 5/3/2021 2021-Ohio-1556
Martin v. Payne 11-20-05Appellants did not establish that village was negligent with respect to proprietary function of maintenance, operation, and upkeep of its sewer sufficiently to defeat sovereign immunity under summary judgment.ShawPaulding 5/3/2021 5/3/2021 2021-Ohio-1557
State v. Shurelds 1-20-35Trial court did not err by denying suppression motion; trial court did not err by denying motion to withdraw no contest pleas; however, trial court failed to clearly make necessary consecutive sentences findings at the sentencing hearing in this matter.ShawAllen 5/3/2021 5/3/2021 2021-Ohio-1560
12345678