|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State ex rel. Donahue v. Allen Cty. Bd. of Elections
| 1-21-28 | There is no genuine issue of material fact reflecting that the board of elections abused its discretion or clearly disregarded the applicable law. Consequently, there is no genuine issue of material fact reflecting that petitioners are entitled to relief in prohibition. Thus, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of respondents. | Per Curiam | Allen |
9/20/2021
|
9/20/2021
| 2021-Ohio-3292 |
|
In re K.B.
| 5-20-37; 5-20-38 | The trial court did not err in granting the Agency’s motion for legal custody of the children. The trial court properly considered the statutory factors in arriving to its decision. | Shaw | Hancock |
9/20/2021
|
9/20/2021
| 2021-Ohio-3273 |
|
Simindinger v. Meeker
| 11-21-02 | We lack jurisdiction to consider the plaintiff-appellant's first assignment of error. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting the defendant-appellee to file an out-of-rule answer based on "excusable neglect". The trial court did not err as a matter of law by determining that plaintiff-appellant's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted since the statute of limitations operated as a time bar of plaintiff-appellant's claims. | Zimmerman | Paulding |
9/20/2021
|
9/20/2021
| 2021-Ohio-3274 |
|
State v. Rebarchek
| 5-21-02; 5-21-03 | Statute allowing indefinite sentece does not facially violate the constitution. | Willamowski | Hancock |
9/13/2021
|
9/13/2021
| 2021-Ohio-3142 |
|
State v. Hardy
| 1-20-36 | Under State v. Pendleton, 2020-Ohio-6833, a trial court may not sentence a defendant for trafficking in five grams but less than ten grams of heroin and for trafficking in five grams but less than ten grams of a fentanyl-related compound when only 7.15 grams of a heroin-fenanyl compound changed hands. | Willamowski | Allen |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2977 |
|
State v. Salyers
| 1-20-55 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's petition for postconviction relief without a hearing. | Miller | Allen |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2978 |
|
State v. Thompson
| 9-20-35 | Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant-appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Miller | Marion |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2979 |
|
State v. Richard
| 9-20-36 | Defendant-appellant’s corrupting-another-with-drugs conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant’s constitutional right a speedy trial was not violated. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion for severance. Defendant-appellant’s sentence is not contrary to law. | Zimmerman | Marion |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2980 |
|
State v. Barnhart
| 12-20-08 | The trial court did not err in applying the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law to Appellant’s case. Appellant failed to demonstrate that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the unconstitutionality of the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law. | Shaw | Putnam |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2874 |
|
State v. Bortree
| 8-20-67 | Statute of limitations for attempted aggravated murder had not passed; appellant did not establish prejudicial preindictment delay; trial court did not err by denying various suppression issues; conviction was supported by the evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Shaw | Logan |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2873 |
|