Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 188 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re X.J. 2026-CA-24The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the request of father’s counsel to continue the evidentiary hearing on the permanent custody of his child. Judgment affirmed.HansemanClark 7/2/2026 7/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2527
State v. Ryan 2025-CA-65Appellant’s guilty pleas satisfied the requirements of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) and (b). His 30-month prison sentence for abduction is not contrary to law and is not subject to vacation or modification under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2). The trial court did not err in failing to address appellant’s placement in an intensive program prison. Judgment affirmed.TuckerGreene 7/2/2026 7/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2529
Gillespie v. Troy 30686The trial court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of their statutory immunity from tort liability for a high-speed police pursuit that ended in a fatal accident. Judgment reversed and case remanded for entry of final judgment in appellants’ favor.TuckerMontgomery 7/2/2026 7/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2526
State v. Jackson 30558Appellant’s convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error by overruling appellant’s motion to sever charges because the offenses were connected in a continuous course of criminal conduct and the evidence supporting the offenses was simple and direct. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to renew appellant’s pretrial motion to sever because there was no likelihood that had the motion been renewed at trial, it would have been granted or changed the outcome of the trial. Judgment affirmed.LewisMontgomery 7/2/2026 7/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2528
Williamson v. Farmers Ins. Co. 30717In a case involving the interpretation of an insurance policy, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the insurer on the entirety of the insured’s complaint. The record establishes that the insured is not entitled to damages for lost rent or stolen personal property as a matter of law, but genuine issues of material fact remain relating to whether the insured can recover the other damages sought by the complaint. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.LewisMontgomery 7/2/2026 7/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2530
12345678910...>>