|
|
State v. Mason
| CA2025-05-035 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it accepted appellant's guilty plea before completing an Intervention in Lieu of Conviction ("ILC") hearing when the appellant failed to attend two scheduled ILC hearings and ten additional hearings. Appellant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary as it complied with Crim.R. 11. Appellant's nine-month sentence was not contrary to law because the trial court considered R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 in sentencing her, nine months was within the permissible prison time range, and because the trial court properly imposed discretionary postrelease control and court costs. | Byrne | Warren |
6/1/2026
|
6/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2039 |
|
State v. Lane
| CA2025-09-072 | Trial court did not err in determining that grand theft of motor vehicle and attempted grand theft of firearm were not allied offenses subject to merger. Defendant stole vehicle containing firearm in glove box, then later removed firearm and kept it in her bedroom. Victim suffered two separate harms. Offenses committed at different times and places. Defendant's retention of firearm in her residence reflected independent purpose beyond stealing the car. | M. Powell | Clermont |
6/1/2026
|
6/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2034 |
|
State v. Williams
| CA2025-07-078 | The trial court did not commit plain error when it imposed community control where appellant and his counsel participated in crafting the community control condition at issue and the condition is reasonably related to rehabilitating appellant, is related to appellant's aggravated assault charge, and is reasonably related to future criminality. | Hendrickson | Butler |
6/1/2026
|
6/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2033 |
|
Gabel v. RMH Franchise Corp.
| CA2025-11-088 | Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee based on res judicata; appellant's attempt to voluntarily dismiss a prior suit without prejudice was a nullity where summary judgment constituted a final order, as it had determined the claims against appellee and rendered a subrogation claim involving another defendant moot. | Piper | Clermont |
6/1/2026
|
6/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2035 |
|
In re L.M.H.
| CA2025-07-061 | Trial court did not err in denying Civ.R. 60(B) motion where appellant failed to file direct appeal. The failure to timely appeal barred collateral attack through Civ.R. 60(B). Ineffective-assistance claim is not cognizable in ordinary civil proceedings not resulting in incarceration. | M. Powell | Warren |
6/1/2026
|
6/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2040 |
|