|
|
State v. Poole
| 23AP-271 | The trial court did not err in instructing the jury on self-defense. The admission of a victim’s 9-1-1 call did not violate the Confrontation Clause because the victim made the 9-1-1 call during an ongoing emergency for the primary purpose of seeking police and medical assistance. Defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to object to (1) the self-defense instruction and (2) a detective’s impression of defendant based on defendant’s interview with police. Defendant’s convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Finally, in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(1)(a), the trial court did not err in sentencing defendant to multiple consecutive prison terms for firearm specifications. | Dingus | Franklin |
6/16/2026
|
6/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2270 |
|
State ex rel. HCR ManorCare, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
| 24AP-729 | Relator’s request for a writ of mandamus based on alleged error in the grant of permanent disability benefits to its former employee is denied, and the objections to the decision of the magistrate, which is adopted in full, are overruled. The Industrial Commission did not rely on an internally inconsistent medical report when concluding that respondent was permanently disabled and unable to perform sustained remunerative employment. The superfluous references to vocational rehabilitation were irrelevant to the doctor’s ultimate finding concerning respondent’s permanent disability and, contrary to respondent’s argument, were based upon findings from a physical examination of respondent and memorialized in the report. | Mentel | Franklin |
6/16/2026
|
6/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2271 |
|
State v. R.S.M.
| 25AP-570 | Because trial court did not provide appellant notice of potential consecutive sentence at time of sentencing to community control, trial court was not authorized to impose a consecutive prison term on appellant following revocation of his community control; trial court’s judgment imposing consecutive sentence reversed, and matter remanded to trial court. | Leland | Franklin |
6/16/2026
|
6/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2274 |
|
Telhio Credit Union v. Byrd
| 25AP-425 | Appeal dismissed. Appellant’s assignments of error challenge the trial court’s granting of summary judgment, rather than the denial of appellant’s motion for relief from judgment which is the subject of this appeal. This court therefore lacks jurisdiction to address appellant’s arguments and the appeal is dismissed. | Boggs | Franklin |
6/16/2026
|
6/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2273 |
|
State ex rel. Cordle v. Indus. Comm.
| 25AP-484 | MANDAMUS — R.C. 4123.522: Relator challenged the Industrial Commission’s denial of his request for relief under R.C. 4123.522, wherein relator sought to extend his time for appeal by alleging his attorney did not receive notice of the commission’s order refusing relator’s appeal from the staff hearing officer’s order disallowing his workers’ compensation claim in its entirety. Following a hearing, the commission found relator’s attorney failed to rebut the presumption that he received notice of the commission’s order. The magistrate correctly determined the commission did not abuse its discretion in denying relator’s request for R.C. 4123.522 relief. Magistrate’s decision adopted without objection; writ of mandamus denied. | Edelstein | Franklin |
6/11/2026
|
6/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2193 |
|