Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:	-Ohio-	WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:

Hide Topics and Issues column

This search returned 5 rows.

Rows per page:

Case Caption	Case No.	Topics and Issues	Author	Citation / County	Decided	Posted	WebCite
State v. Martin	23AP-340	Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. The state presented sufficient evidence for a jury to convict appellant of the various counts. Appellant failed to show on appeal that his conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence.	Boggs	Franklin	1/14/2025	1/14/2025	2025-Ohio-89
Glass v. Eshun	24AP-276	The trial court did not err in awarding appellant only $200 for her claim against appellee relating to a construction project at her home. Appellant failed to demonstrate the trial court denied her due process by not giving her a meaningful opportunity to present her case against appellee. Judgment affirmed.	Luper Schuster	Franklin	1/14/2025	1/14/2025	2025-Ohio-90
In re T.R.	24AP-225	Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations and Juvenile Branch is affirmed. Appellant did not file objections to the magistrate’s decision in the trial court and failed to argue plain-error on appeal.	Per Curiam	Franklin	1/9/2025	1/9/2025	2025-Ohio-51
Fortis Capital, Ltd. v. Mancini	24AP-171	Trial court’s journal entry granting in part and denying in part defendants’ Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motions to dismiss and denying defendants’ motions pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(7) and 19(A) did not grant or deny a provisional remedy and was not a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4). Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, based on the lack of a final, appealable order.	Boggs	Franklin	1/7/2025	1/7/2025	2025-Ohio-31
McCown v. Neibert	24AP-185	Appeal dismissed. Trial court’s agreed judgment entry adopting the parties’ settlement agreement was not a final appealable order.	Boggs	Franklin	1/7/2025	1/7/2025	2025-Ohio-32