|
|
Garnett v. ViaQuest Residential Servs., L.L.C.
| 25AP-631 | The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee. There are no genuine issues of material fact regarding appellant’s claim of hostile work environment sexual harassment under R.C. 4112; neither are there genuine issues of material fact regarding appellant’s claim for retaliation under R.C. 4112. Judgment affirmed. | Beatty Blunt | Franklin |
9/24/2026
|
9/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3742 |
|
Doe v. Columbus
| 25AP-798 & 25AP-799 | The trial court erred by granting the city’s Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint based on its premature determination that the consolidated complaint asserts claims related to the city’s performance of a governmental function and that the city was entitled to political-subdivision immunity. | Boggs | Franklin |
9/24/2026
|
9/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3743 |
|
State v. White
| 25AP-964 | The trial court properly denied defendant-appellant’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence after he discovered that two detectives pled guilty to misdemeanor charges involving falsifying time sheets for taking college classes during duty hours. The trial court found the charges did not involve any homicide investigation and had no impact on the trial. The detectives did not testify at trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion without a hearing. Judgment affirmed. | Leland | Franklin |
9/24/2026
|
9/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3744 |
|
Allen v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation
| 26AP-207 | On appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint under Civ.R. 12(B)(1). Although the complaint was couched in terms of tortious conduct and monetary damages, it sought to challenge the constitutionality of Ohio tax law and to overturn prior judgments for unpaid taxes. The Court of Claims properly held that the plaintiffs’ claims were outside the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed. | Dingus | Franklin |
9/24/2026
|
9/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3745 |
|
State v. Krouse
| 25AP-850 | Guilty plea to charges in adult court following discretionary transfer of cases from juvenile court did not waive the defendant’s right to challenge the juvenile court’s determination of whether the defendant was amenable to rehabilitation in the juvenile system. Juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in determining that defendant was not amenable to rehabilitation because it weighed the factors in favor of and against transfer and set forth those factors in its decision. The record supported the juvenile court’s conclusions in weighing the appropriate factors. | Dorrian | Franklin |
9/22/2026
|
9/22/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3700 |
|