Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 233 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. R.M.M. 20AP-6Trial court did not err in denying appellant's application for an order to seal the records in six criminal cases as he did not qualify as an eligible offender under R.C. 2953.31.BrownFranklin 9/21/2021 9/21/2021 2021-Ohio-3314
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cloyes 20AP-107Appeal dismissed because appellant failed to comply with App.R. 16Per CuriamFranklin 9/21/2021 9/21/2021 2021-Ohio-3316
State v. Williams 20AP-145The trial court did not err by admitting cellphone recordings of the surveillance video footage into evidence, as cellphone recordings were duplicate recordings under Evid.R. 1003. Appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgement affirmed.SadlerFranklin 9/21/2021 9/21/2021 2021-Ohio-3317
State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 284 v. State Emp. Relations Bd. 20AP-307The trial court correctly concluded that SERB did not abuse its discretion in finding the absence of probable cause for an unfair labor practice under R.C. 4117.11(A)(1) or (A)(5). Judgment affirmed.MentelFranklin 9/21/2021 9/21/2021 2021-Ohio-3318
Village At Gender Condominium Assn. v. JHM Rental Mgt., L.L.C. 19AP-834Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for relief from judgment confirming foreclosure sale. Intervenor-appellant failed to demonstrate he was entitled to relief under Civ.R. 60(B) based on a unilateral mistake when he believed the property was not being sold subject to any liens, because the full property description on the auction website as well as the foreclosure judgment and the published notice of sale indicated the property was being sold subject to an existing first mortgage.SadlerFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3216
State ex rel. Hernandez v. Indus. Comm. 20AP-163The magistrate's decision recommending denial of the writ of mandamus seeking an order vacating the Industrial Commission's denial of relief under R.C. 4123.522 is adopted in its entirety. Relator filed no objections and our review, under Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(c), reveals no error of law or other evident defect in the magistrate's decision.MentelFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3217
Logan v. Access Ohio, L.L.C. 20AP-422Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err when it dismissed the appellant's complaint under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.MentelFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3219
State v. Johnson 20AP-469Appellant failed to demonstrate that the evidence was insufficient or that the jury clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that his convictions on the counts of aggravated burglary, felonious assault and having a weapon while under disability must be reversed and a new trial ordered. The jury was free to believe the testimony of the victim rather that of appellant and appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence merely because the jury found the testimony of the victim credible. Judgment affirmed.Beatty BluntFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3220
In re T.L. 20AP-591Juvenile court did not err when it granted PCC to the agency because clear and convincing evidence supported both the juvenile court’s finding, pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d), appellant’s two minor children had been in the temporary custody of the agency for twelve or more months of a consecutive twenty-two-month period, and the finding PCC was in the best interest of both children under R.C. 2151.414(D)(2).JamisonFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3221
State v. Webster 20AP-171The trial court did not plainly err in instructing the jury on aiding and abetting, Webster did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel, and the sufficiency of the evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence support Webster's convictions of aggravated burglary, kidnapping, aggravated murder, murder, felonious assault, having weapons while under disability and the accompanying firearm specifications. Luper SchusterFranklin 9/16/2021 9/17/2021 2021-Ohio-3218