|
|
State v. Newton
| 25AP-481 & 25AP-482 | Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Appellant’s Fourth Amendment rights were not violated as the warrant of his cell phone was supported by probable cause and noncompliance with Crim.R. 41 was an administrative error that did not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Under plain error standard of review, Appellant did not show prosecutorial misconduct. Appellant’s conviction was also not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court did not err in allowing the admission of medical records as they were admissible under Evid.R. 803(4). Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting joinder nor were Newton’s speedy trial rights violated, nor was appellant’s counsel ineffective as a motion asserting speedy trial rights would have lacked a reasonable probability of success. Trial court did not commit plain error in not merging offenses as the offenses here involved separate victims. Having found no errors in Appellant’s assignments of error, appellant’s cumulative error claim is also overruled. | Boggs | Franklin |
6/25/2026
|
6/25/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2416 |
|
Willow Bend Apts. v. Koster
| 25AP-831 | Motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is granted because the tenant-appellant was removed from the premises and no longer resides at the property. Because possession was restored to the landlord-appellee, the appeal is moot. | Dorrian | Franklin |
6/25/2026
|
6/25/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2417 |
|
Raza v. Dorner
| 25AP-993 | Appeal dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failure to include an affidavit of merit in a medical malpractice case. Since the dismissal was otherwise than upon the merits, and there is still time to refile under the statute of limitations, there is no final appealable order. | Leland | Franklin |
6/25/2026
|
6/25/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2418 |
|
Howell Tax Accounting, Inc. v. Monto
| 25AP-1006 | Because appellants appealed from a decision granting judgment on the pleadings as to the remedy of a constructive trust, appellants did not appeal a final, appealable order. Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Boggs | Franklin |
6/25/2026
|
6/25/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2419 |
|
State ex rel. Hogan v. Hoying
| 26AP-98 | The magistrate recommends granting respondent’s motion and dismissing relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus because relator has failed to strictly comply with the inmate filing requirements in R.C. 2969.25(C). Finding no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate’s decision, this court adopts the magistrate’s decision as our own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law. In accordance with the magistrate’s decision, we grant respondent’s motion to dismiss. | Dingus | Franklin |
6/25/2026
|
6/25/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2420 |
|