|
|
05/27/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters. | | |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1932 |
|
Posan v. Boyer
| 2025-0491 | Cause remanded to court of appeals for application of Hoskins v. Cleveland. | | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898 |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1898 |
|
State ex rel. Ctr. for Media & Democracy v. Yost
| 2023-0270 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Discovery—In public-records mandamus action, court of appeals issued discovery order compelling responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents and ordering attorney general to appear for deposition—Discovery in a public-records mandamus action must be restricted to conform with the purpose of discovery set forth in Civ.R. 26(A) and the scope of discovery set forth in Civ.R. 26(B)(1)—When requested records cannot be or have not been produced, courts should limit discovery in a public-records mandamus action to the nature of the public office’s search for responsive records and to information relevant to the claims and defenses asserted by the parties—When requested records exist and can be produced but the parties dispute whether the records should be produced, any discovery must be confined by the claims asserted by the requester and the defenses asserted by the public office relative to producing the records—In issuing its discovery order, the court of appeals misapplied the law and abused its discretion in determining the correct scope of discovery under Civ.R. 26(B)(1) in context of a public-records mandamus action and in ordering deposition of a high-ranking government official—Court of appeals’ discovery order vacated and cause remanded for proper consideration of discovery requests. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1899 |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1899 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1880 |
|
In re Application of Oak Run Solar Project, L.L.C.
| 2024-1477 | Public utilities—Certificate of construction for solar farm—R.C. 4906.10(A)—Adm.Code 4906-4-08(D)(4)(e)—Ohio Power Siting Board did not obtain from applicant seeking certificate to construct solar farm photographic simulations or artist’s pictorial sketches of substations for the proposed project, which the board needed to adequately assess the proposed project from public vantage points under Adm.Code 4906-4-08(D)(4)(e) and to make the substantive statutory determinations regarding the visual impacts of the proposed project under R.C. 4906.10(A)—Orders affirmed in part and reversed in part and matter remanded. | Fischer, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1849 |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1849 |
|
State ex rel. Yost v. Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn.
| 2024-1250 | Mandamus—Standing—Parens patriae doctrine—Parens patriae standing allows for the State to sue for indirect injury, which is inconsistent with the requirement that relators in mandamus cases be directly benefited or injured by a judgment in the case—Attorney general would not directly benefit from a writ of mandamus in a case affecting a small number of pupils within one school district and therefore cannot show that the case concerns well-being of a substantial segment of the State’s population—Parens patriae standing cannot apply in a mandamus case and attorney general lacks standing—Cause dismissed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1878 |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1878 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1912 |
|
In re Resignation of Henniger
| 2026-0573 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1884 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Official versions released—Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1897 |
|
In re Resignation of Yerman
| 2026-0541 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1883 |
|
05/22/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/22/2026
|
5/22/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1877 |
|
05/22/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/22/2026
|
5/22/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1879 |
|
05/21/2026 Case Announcements
| | Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/21/2026
|
5/21/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1848 |
|
05/20/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/20/2026
|
5/20/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1819 |
|
05/19/2026 Case Announcements
| | Mediation matters. | | |
5/19/2026
|
5/19/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1817 |
|
05/18/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/18/2026
|
5/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1804 |
|
05/15/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/15/2026
|
5/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1786 |
|
05/15/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals not accepted for review. | | |
5/15/2026
|
5/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1801 |
|
05/14/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/14/2026
|
5/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1759 |
|
05/13/2026 Case Announcements
| | Disciplinary cases—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/13/2026
|
5/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1740 |
|
05/13/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/13/2026
|
5/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1760 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1724 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1687 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1686 |
|
05/11/2026 Case Announcements
| | Official versions released. | | |
5/11/2026
|
5/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1690 |
|
05/08/2026 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
5/8/2026
|
5/8/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1670 |
|
05/08/2026 Case Announcements
| | Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/8/2026
|
5/8/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1671 |
|
05/06/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/6/2026
|
5/6/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1637 |
|
05/05/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/5/2026
|
5/5/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1621 |
|
05/04/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1596 |
|
State ex rel. Hill v. LaRose
| 2026-0531 | Elections—Mandamus, declaratory judgment, and injunction—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to accept replacement candidate for lieutenant governor—R.C. 3513.311(C) does not permit replacement of candidate for lieutenant governor within 70 days of primary election unless former candidate died—Court lacks original jurisdiction over claims seeking declaratory judgment or prohibitory injunction—Complaint dismissed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1601 |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1601 |
|
05/04/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1613 |
|
05/03/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1600 |
|
State ex rel. Shannon v. Ogg
| 2026-0433 | Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel clerk of city council to determine that petitions for recall election do not meet city charter’s signature requirements and to certify the particulars in which the petitions are defective to the person who filed them—City-charter provision requires that a recall petition must include a number of signatures equal to at least 15 percent of electors who voted at last regular municipal election at which mayor’s office was on ballot, not simply 15 percent of the electors who cast a vote for mayor—Writ granted. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1599 |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1599 |
|
State ex rel. Leneghan v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections
| 2026-0468 | Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to declare that relator is a resident of Delaware County for election purposes, maintain relator’s name on poll books as a properly registered voter, maintain relator’s name as a candidate on the May 5, 2026 primary-election ballot, and retract and rescind any referrals to county prosecutor and secretary of state for investigation of voter fraud—Relator’s request for order compelling board to retract or rescind any referrals for investigation of voter fraud dismissed because it is a request for injunctive relief rather than a proper request for mandamus relief—Writ denied as to relator’s remaining mandamus claims because board did not abuse its discretion or act in clear disregard of applicable law—Writ dismissed in part and denied in part. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1598 |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1598 |
|
05/01/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1597 |
|
05/01/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1577 |
|
In re P.M.S.
| 2023-1531 | Criminal law—Juvenile delinquency—Sufficiency of the evidence—Rape—R.C. 2907.02(A)(2)—A rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that juvenile offender used force, as defined by R.C. 2901.01(A)(1), to compel victim to submit to sexual conduct—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. | Brunner, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1543 |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1543 |
|
State v. Morris
| 2023-1614 | Criminal law—Constitutional law—Right to counsel—Right to counsel guaranteed under Article I, Section 10 of Ohio Constitution did not extend to defendant’s preindictment investigatory interview—Defendant’s right to counsel under Sixth Amendment to United States Constitution attached when he made his initial appearance and court informed him of the charges against him, appointed him counsel, and set bail—Defendant did not unambiguously and unequivocally invoke Sixth Amendment right to counsel during interview—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded to trial court. | DeWine, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1519 |
4/30/2026
|
4/30/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1519 |
|
04/30/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
4/30/2026
|
4/30/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1566 |
|
04/30/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
4/30/2026
|
4/30/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1546 |
|
04/29/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review. | | |
4/29/2026
|
4/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1522 |
|
04/29/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
4/29/2026
|
4/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1534 |
|
State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz
| 2024-1433 | Oil and gas—Regulatory takings—Court of appeals did not err in finding no total regulatory taking, because private company failed to prove that State’s suspension of operations of saltwater-injection wells deprived it of all economically beneficial use of its leasehold—Court of appeals did err in determining that State effected a compensable taking because proper balancing of Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York City factors weighs against finding a partial regulatory taking—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and writ denied. | DeWine, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1487 |
4/29/2026
|
4/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1487 |
|
In re Rev. of the Power-Purchase-Agreement Rider of Ohio Power Co. for 2018 and 2019
| 2024-1735 | Public utilities—Public Utilities Commission did not commit reversible error in deciding to credit evidence showing that a must-run strategy for operating two coal plants was prudent when the decision to utilize that strategy was made—Commission did not violate procedural due process or Adm.Code 4901-1-28(E) in denying party’s motion for subpoena to compel commission staff member to appear and testify at commission’s hearing, because testimony presented by other witnesses covered the topic of concern and the party had an opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses—Commission did not err in failing to apply an appearance-of-impropriety standard when considering whether auditor was prevented from conducting an independent audit—Orders affirmed. | Fischer, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1485 |
4/29/2026
|
4/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1485 |
|
04/28/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
4/28/2026
|
4/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1536 |
|
04/28/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
4/28/2026
|
4/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1521 |
|
04/28/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions. | | |
4/28/2026
|
4/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1471 |
|
In re L.E.S.
| 2024-0303 | Domestic relations—Parentage—R.C. 3111.95(A), which provides an avenue for the consenting spouse of a woman who conceives a child through artificial insemination to be recognized as the natural parent of the child, does not apply to same-sex couples who were not married at time of insemination—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded. | DeWine, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1449 |
4/28/2026
|
4/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1449 |
|
04/27/2026 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
4/27/2026
|
4/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1489 |
|