|
|
State v. Tisdale
| 25 CO 0024 | motion to certify conflict denied; one cited case had no majority holding and did not involve cell phone data; other cited case was based on emphasized distinct facts and a distinct legal issue while containing waived arguments by the state on topics raised and relied upon in our case. | Per Curiam | Columbiana |
8/13/2026
|
8/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3124 |
|
B.U. v. Bolshakov
| 26 BE 0008 | violation of domestic violence civil protection order and purge conditions; on petitioner’s motion, court imposed jail sentence previously suspended twice in prior contempt proceedings and granted petitioner’s motion to modify CPO by extending term from two years to five years while maintaining children as protected persons. | Robb | Belmont |
8/12/2026
|
8/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3123 |
|
Klingensmith v. Klingensmith
| 26 MA 0009 | Reallocation of parental rights; R.C. 3109.04; trial court properly found change of circumstances due to mother’s repeated refusal to allow father visitation or contact, and mother’s continuing disregard for court orders; court found it was in the best interests for father to become custodial parent of younger of the two children due children’s need for regular contact with both parents and mother’s refusal to facilitate contact; judgment affirmed. | Waite | Mahoning |
8/7/2026
|
8/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3078 |
|
State v. Jackson
| 25 CO 0031 | Untimely filed motion for reconsideration; App.R. 26(A); appellant raises no obvious errors nor cites to matters that were either not considered or not fully considered; motion dismissed. | Per Curiam | Columbiana |
8/7/2026
|
8/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3077 |
|
State v. Davis
| 25 CO 0050 | Minor misdemeanor traffic citation; speedy trial errors waived due to written waiver of time filed by defendant; state provided discovery requested by defendant so no basis for dismissal as a sanction for discovery violations; trial court did not abuse discretion in granting state a continuance of trial due to unavailability of a witness; verdict is not against sufficiency or weight of the evidence; defendant, representing himself pro se, held to the same standard as a defendant represented by counsel; appellant’s brief violated Rules of Appellate procedure; judgment affirmed. | Waite | Columbiana |
8/3/2026
|
8/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2993 |
|