Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 5 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Wright L-21-1191Motion to dismiss on speedy trial basis. COVID-19 pandemic.DuhartLucas 1/21/2022 1/21/2022 2022-Ohio-143
State v. Saldivar L-21-1056The trial court did not err in allowing the state to reopen its case to clarify prior testimony. Further, the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony of delayed or partial disclosure of child sexual abuse. Crim.R. 29; venue; not the spouse; Daubert.PietrykowskiLucas 1/21/2022 1/21/2022 2022-Ohio-144
State v. Hamilton L-21-1150Appellant's no contest plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligently entered, and thus must be vacated, where the trial court made no mention of appellant’s privilege against compulsory self-incrimination at the plea hearing.ZmudaLucas 1/14/2022 1/20/2022 2022-Ohio-139
Adamski v. Adamski L-21-1067Judgment granting a domestic violence civil protection order in favor of wife and child was affirmed where the evidence showed that respondent received adequate notice of the full hearing under R.C. 3113.31(D)(2)(a) and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that respondent presented a risk of committing domestic violence against the parties’ child.MayleLucas 1/7/2022 1/7/2022 2022-Ohio-32
State v. Hovatter S-21-006The convictions for complicity to rape, endangering children and complicity to gross sexual imposition were supported by sufficient evidence. In addition, trial counsel was effective and performed at an objective standard of reasonable representation.PietrykowskiSandusky 1/7/2022 1/7/2022 2022-Ohio-33