Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 94 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Crabtree 26CA1246community control; revocation hearing; probation violations; abuse of discretionHessAdams 7/1/2026 7/7/2026 2026-Ohio-2575
State v. Johnson 24CA4071CRIMINAL-STOP-DETENTION-SEARCH-SUPPRESSION-JAIL CALLS-EVID.R. 801 (D)(2)(a)-POST-ARREST SILENCE-HARMLESS ERROR-SUFFICIENCY-CUMULATIVE ERROR - De minimis speeding violation provided probable cause to stop vehicle and detection of odor of marijuana provided additional probable cause to detain appellant and conduct a search of the vehicle; any reference by the prosecution to appellant's post-arrest silence or failure to testify at trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; jail house phone calls of appellant and her co-defendant were admissible under Evid.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) as statements of a party opponent; there was no cumulative error.SmithScioto 7/1/2026 7/9/2026 2026-Ohio-2624
State v. Jordan 24CA4070CRIMINAL-SEARCH-POST-ARREST SILENCE-JAIL CALLS-EVID.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) - De minimis speeding violation provided probable cause to stop vehicle and detection of odor of raw marijuana provided additional probable cause to detain appellant and conduct a search of the vehicle; any reference by the prosecution to appellant's post-arrest silence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; jailhouse phone calls of appellant and her co-defendant during joint trial were admissible under Evid.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) as statements of a party opponent.SmithScioto 7/1/2026 7/9/2026 2026-Ohio-2625
State v. Durst 25CA1Rape of a minor; consecutive sentence; course-of-conduct; proportionate; Reagan Tokes Law; definite sentence; indefinite sentence; R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); R.C. 2929.14(A)(1)(b); R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); R.C. 2950.01(A)(1); R.C. 2950.02(A)(2); R.C. 2950.06(B)(3); R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)WilkinGallia 6/30/2026 7/8/2026 2026-Ohio-2600
State v. Dayton 24CA12CRIMINA-CRIM.R. 22-APP.R. 9(C) - Crim.R. 22 mandates that proceedings be recorded in serious offense cases and where appellant's plea hearing was unable to be prepared and provided as a transcript to appellant and appellant followed App.R. 9(C) procedure, appellant demonstrated material prejudice and judgment is reversed.SmithGallia 6/30/2026 7/9/2026 2026-Ohio-2623
12345678910...>>