|
|
State v. Crabtree
| 26CA1246 | community control; revocation hearing; probation violations; abuse of discretion | Hess | Adams |
7/1/2026
|
7/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2575 |
|
State v. Johnson
| 24CA4071 | CRIMINAL-STOP-DETENTION-SEARCH-SUPPRESSION-JAIL CALLS-EVID.R. 801 (D)(2)(a)-POST-ARREST SILENCE-HARMLESS ERROR-SUFFICIENCY-CUMULATIVE ERROR - De minimis speeding violation provided probable cause to stop vehicle and detection of odor of marijuana provided additional probable cause to detain appellant and conduct a search of the vehicle; any reference by the prosecution to appellant's post-arrest silence or failure to testify at trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; jail house phone calls of appellant and her co-defendant were admissible under Evid.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) as statements of a party opponent; there was no cumulative error. | Smith | Scioto |
7/1/2026
|
7/9/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2624 |
|
State v. Jordan
| 24CA4070 | CRIMINAL-SEARCH-POST-ARREST SILENCE-JAIL CALLS-EVID.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) - De minimis speeding violation provided probable cause to stop vehicle and detection of odor of raw marijuana provided additional probable cause to detain appellant and conduct a search of the vehicle; any reference by the prosecution to appellant's post-arrest silence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; jailhouse phone calls of appellant and her co-defendant during joint trial were admissible under Evid.R. 801 (D)(2)(a) as statements of a party opponent. | Smith | Scioto |
7/1/2026
|
7/9/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2625 |
|
State v. Durst
| 25CA1 | Rape of a minor; consecutive sentence; course-of-conduct; proportionate; Reagan Tokes Law; definite sentence; indefinite sentence; R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); R.C. 2929.14(A)(1)(b); R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); R.C. 2950.01(A)(1); R.C. 2950.02(A)(2); R.C. 2950.06(B)(3); R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) | Wilkin | Gallia |
6/30/2026
|
7/8/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2600 |
|
State v. Dayton
| 24CA12 | CRIMINA-CRIM.R. 22-APP.R. 9(C) - Crim.R. 22 mandates that proceedings be recorded in serious offense cases and where appellant's plea hearing was unable to be prepared and provided as a transcript to appellant and appellant followed App.R. 9(C) procedure, appellant demonstrated material prejudice and judgment is reversed. | Smith | Gallia |
6/30/2026
|
7/9/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2623 |
|