|
Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
In re L.G.
| 25CA3 | Permanent custody–Trial court’s judgment placing child in the agency’s permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence–Judgment affirmed | Wilkin | Athens |
8/5/2025
|
8/13/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2855 |
State v. Adkins
| 24CA3 | Fifth Amendment, Consider exercising the right to silence when determining guilt; Crim.R. 32, Final appealable order; Merger and state election of offense for sentencing; Surviving merger; Bench trial, Structural error | Wilkin | Lawrence |
8/5/2025
|
8/11/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2833 |
State v. Reed
| 23CA4041 | Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Knowing, Voluntary, and Intelligent Plea, Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea, Counsel's Failure to Review Discovery with Client; Crim.R. 32.1; Change of Heart; Nine-Factor Test for Withdrawal of Guilty Plea, Newly Discovered Evidence | Wilkin | Scioto |
8/5/2025
|
8/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2753 |
State v. Andrews
| 24CA4076 | Trial court did not err when it denied motion to suppress evidence. | Abele | Scioto |
8/1/2025
|
8/8/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2803 |
State v. Taylor
| 25CA2 | Res judicata barred appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion and request for a suppression hearing. | Abele | Lawrence |
8/1/2025
|
8/13/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2853 |
State v. Dodridge
| 22CA19 | CRIMINAL-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - The trial court did not err in declaring the victim to be a hostile witness under Evid.R. 611(C), nor did it err in interrogating the victim in accordance with Evid.R. 614(B); although the victim's prior written statement that was attached to the police was erroneously admitted into evidence as extrinsic evidence of impeachment, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; plain error did occur as a result of the trial court's failure to provide a limiting instruction, nor was trial counsel ineffective for failing to request a limiting instruction; body cam video that was destroyed was not materially exculpable evidence and the defendant failed to prove that the State acted in bad faith in failing to preserve potentially useful evidence; because the defendant's conviction for disrupting public services was supported by sufficient evidence, the trial court did not err in denying his Crim.R. 29(A) motion for judgment of acquittal; defendant failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial as a result of cumulative error. | Smith | Lawrence |
8/1/2025
|
8/13/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2856 |
State v. Woodfork
| 23CA22 | CRIMINAL-RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE-INFERIOR DEGREE OFFENSE-LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE-BATSON CHALLENGE-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Trial court's denial of motion for continuance did not deny the appellant his right to counsel of choice; the appellant was not entitled to inferior degree offense and lesser included offense jury instructions; the trial court committed no error in allowing the State's peremptory challenge where no Batson violation occurred; the appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit. | Smith | Ross |
8/1/2025
|
8/7/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2786 |
State v. Shamblin
| 24CA26 | CRIMINAL-POSTCONVICTION RELIEF-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL-RES JUDICATA - The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's petition for postconviction relief without holding a hearing; appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised in his petition was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. | Smith | Pickaway |
7/29/2025
|
8/6/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2760 |
Burgh v. Potter
| 24CA3 | Civ.R. 12(B)(6); de novo; preliminary agreement; contract; whether a contract exists is question of fact; contract interpretation is matter of law | Wilkin | Washington |
7/29/2025
|
8/6/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2765 |
State v. Farmer
| 24CA4 | jury instructions; plain error; verdict form; privilege; ineffective assistance of counsel; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; sentencing error; Reagan Tokes Law; sentencing notifications | Hess | Jackson |
7/22/2025
|
7/25/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2616 |
State v. Cheatham
| 23CA17 | CRIMINAL-INDICTMENT-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE - While an indictment charging sexual offenses against children need not state with specificity the dates of the alleged abuse as long as the prosecution establishes that the offense occurred during the time frame alleged, and where count alleged that conduct occurred between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014; victim testified that the first sexual contact occurred when she was nine years old; and victim did not become nine years old until May 15, 2014, there was no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to establish that conduct occurred within a reasonable proximity to victim's birthday; decision to call or forego calling witnesses is a tactical decision and deficient performance of trial counsel for purported failure to investigate additional witnesses, where record is silent as to the substance of the suggested testimony and how said testimony would have changed outcome of the proceeding, will not be inferred; where defendant refused a plea offer and proceeded to trial, repeatedly denied all allegations of sexual contact and sexual conduct, and attempted to discredit the victims, requesting jury instructions on the lesser included offense of gross sexual imposition on three counts of rape would have undercut defendant's protestations of innocence, thus, trial counsel was not deficient for failing to request the lesser included instruction. | Smith | Jackson |
7/18/2025
|
7/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2584 |
Cochran v. Cochran
| 24CA21 | marital property; date of termination; duration of marriage; valuation of property; distributive award; financial misconduct | Hess | Athens |
7/18/2025
|
7/21/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2565 |
State v. Kegg
| 23CA16 | Rape, R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); Evid.R. 702; expert witness testimony is beyond knowledge or experience of lay persons, is the result of specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, and is based on reliable scientific, technical, or other specialized information; abuse of discretion; delayed reporting of rape; invited error doctrine; juror bias; ineffective assistance of counsel; deficient performance; prejudice; presumed competent; motion for new trial; Crim.R. 33; R.C. 2953.21 | Wilkin | Athens |
7/17/2025
|
7/28/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2651 |
State v. Harrison
| 25CA1 | indefinite sentence; indeterminate sentence; definite sentence; sentencing error; typographical error; nunc pro tunc; ineffective assistance of trial counsel; res judicata | Hess | Highland |
7/17/2025
|
8/4/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2733 |
State v. Buffington
| 24CA4085 & 24CA4086 | Trial court committed plain error when it entered a judgment of conviction when the defendant did not first enter a plea. | Abele | Scioto |
7/17/2025
|
7/22/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2575 |
State v. Lawson
| 24CA28 | Reverse and remand for trial court to apply New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. , Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). | Abele | Ross |
7/17/2025
|
7/28/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2650 |
State v. Carr
| 23CA4023 | CRIMINAL-SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE-MANIFEST WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE-POSSESSION-CRIM.R. 29 - When an Appellant sets forth specific grounds in a Crim.R. 29 motion, he or she forfeits all other grounds on appeal; where trial court merges convictions for purposes of sentencing, erroneous verdict on the merged count would be harmless error; sufficient circumstantial evidence of guilt supported Appellant's conviction for Aggravated Trafficking of Drugs, particularly as to challenged element of "possession" where multiple officers testified regarding large quantity of methamphetamine and other criminal tools used in trafficking found in appellant's home; appellant's own statement to Chief Probation Officer was incriminating; appellant's statement in jail phone call was incriminating; and appellant's girlfriend/co-defendant's phone contained incriminating text conversations such that any rational trier of fact would have found possession was proven beyond a reasonable doubt; furthermore, based on the foregoing, jury did not lose its way and create a miscarriage of justice and appellant's conviction for aggravated trafficking of drugs was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Smith | Scioto |
7/16/2025
|
7/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2583 |
State v. Alexander
| 24CA4065 | Appeal dismissed; trial court lacks jurisdiction after case is terminated; void judgment; final appealable order; appellate court lacks jurisdiction; R.C. 2505.02(B) | Wilkin | Scioto |
7/16/2025
|
7/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2587 |
State v. Perry
| 23CA20 | outrageous government conduct; due process; entrapment; forfeiture; proportionality | Hess | Jackson |
7/16/2025
|
7/21/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2566 |
State v. Athens
| 24CA31 | summary judgment; Athens City Code 11.03.02(A); R.C. 3736.021; auxiliary container; single-use plastic bags; Home Rule Amendment; general law; statewide and comprehensive legislative enactment; police, sanitary, or similar regulations; prescribe a rule of conduct; direct conflict | Hess | Athens |
7/16/2025
|
7/29/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2652 |
Parsons v. Parsons
| 23CA21 | Spousal support, duration, amount; Spousal support, disability benefits; R.C. 3105.18(B); R.C. 3015.18(C); Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b); Spousal support, burden of proof; Spousal support, equalization of income | Wilkin | Gallia |
7/9/2025
|
7/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2511 |
In re S.B.
| 24CA5 | Abused, neglected, or dependent child; legal custody, R.C. 2151.011(B)(21); best interest of the child; R.C. 3109.04; preponderance of the evidence; legal custodian, R.C. 2151.353(A)(3); abuse of discretion; unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable | Wilkin | Athens |
7/8/2025
|
7/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2586 |
Wilson v. Canup
| 24CA2 | Small claims; verbal contract; meeting of the minds; substantial compliance; de novo review; factual determination-weight of the evidence; clear and convincing evidence | Wilkin | Lawrence |
7/2/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2443 |
Patton v. Moore
| 24CA4 & 24CA5 | Habeas corpus; verified petition, commitment papers, R.C. Chapter 2725; de novo; dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); summary judgment, Civ.R. 56; due process; R.C. 2969.25(C) | Wilkin | Pickaway |
7/1/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2435 |
State v. Kmosko
| 23CA4 | Menacing; Aggravated Menacing; Lesser Included Offense; Jury Instructions; Prosecutorial Misconduct; Closing Arguments; Crim.R. 31(C); Crim.R. 30 (A) | Wilkin | Athens |
7/1/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2433 |
State v. Douglas
| 23CA21 | R.C. 2929.15(C), Domestic violence; Domestic menacing; Bodycam video; Character evidence; Other acts evidence; Other acts-drug use; Evid.R. 404(B); R.C. 2945.59; Evid.R. 403; Imminent physical harm; Victim's state of mind; Hearsay | Wilkin | Athens |
7/1/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2434 |
State v. DeLong
| 23CA1171 | Involuntary manslaughter, R.C. 2903.04(A); felonious assault, R.C. 2903.11(A)(2); firearm specification, R.C. 2941.145; The right to a jury selected from fair cross-section of the community, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments; ineffective assistance of counsel, deficient representation, prejudice , presumption of competence; self-defense; accident; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); forfeiture | Wilkin | Adams |
7/1/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2432 |
Gemmell v. Evergreen Site Holdings, Inc.
| 22CA4 | jurisdiction; foreclosure; final, appealable order; R.C. 2505.02; Civ.R. 54(B); extent of each lienholder's interest; priority of the liens | Hess | Hocking |
6/25/2025
|
6/27/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2258 |
United Assn. Local 168, Apprentice Educational Fund v. Robinson
| 23CA9 | CIVIL-CIV.R. (8)-NOTICE PLEADING-AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES-BREACH OF CONTRACT-LIQUIDATED DAMAGES-PENALTY-SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The defenses of prior material breach, unenforceable penalty, and unenforceable non-competition agreement are all defenses in the nature of confession and avoidance that are waived if not raised affirmatively under Civ.R. 8; because appellant substantially performed under the contract, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellee on its claim of prior material breach; the trial court further erred in characterizing the work-or-pay repayment provision of the contract as an unenforceable non-competition agreement; although the trial court correctly determined that the purported liquidated damages provision was an unenforceable penalty, it erred in granting summary judgment to appellee, and in granting appellant no damages at all. | Smith | Washington |
6/25/2025
|
7/8/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2421 |
State v. Hinton
| 24CA10 | authentication; evidence; ineffective assistance of counsel; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence | Hess | Athens |
6/24/2025
|
6/30/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2291 |
State v. Coby
| 24CA4114 | subject-matter jurisdiction; void; voidable; petition for postconviction relief; R.C. 2953.21(A)(1)(a)(i); untimely; R.C. 2953.23(A) | Hess | Scioto |
6/23/2025
|
6/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2192 |
In re J.M.P.
| 25CA2 | JUVENILE DELINQUENCY-RAPE-GROSS SEXUAL IMPOSITION - Sufficient evidence supported the trial court's delinquency adjudications for rape and gross sexual imposition, and adjudications were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, when ample evidence established that juvenile purposely compelled the victim to submit by force; trial court did not err by classifying juvenile offender registrant; rape and gross sexual imposition offenses did not merge when evidence showed that juvenile committed distinct act of rape and distinct act of gross sexual imposition. | Smith | Athens |
6/20/2025
|
7/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2441 |
State v. Taylor
| 23CA14 | Rape; victim less than ten years of age; abuse of discretion; plain error; harmless error; prejudice; constitutional right to compulsory process; separation of witnesses; exclusion of witnesses; jury selection; replacing alternate juror after jury was sworn in; other acts; grooming; course of conduct; hearsay; victim’s forensic interview; jury instructions; jury instructions on unanimity of the sexual conduct; prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments; vouching; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; Crim.R. 24(G)(1); Crim.R. 31(A); Crim.R. 52; Evid.R. 404(A)(2); Evid.R. 404(B)(1); Evid.R. 608; Evid. R. 615(A); Evid.R. 801; Evid.R. 802; Evid.R. 803(4); R.C. 2505.02(A)(1); R.C. 2907.01(A); R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b); R.C. 2907.02(D); R.C. 2945.29 | Wilkin | Highland |
6/18/2025
|
6/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2250 |
State v. Barrett
| 23CA13 | Assault; first-degree misdemeanor; jail-time sentence; abuse of discretion; overriding purposes of sentence; defendant’s aggressive behavior; physical harm; R.C. 2929.21; R.C. 2929.22 | Wilkin | Ross |
6/17/2025
|
6/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2251 |
State v. Snyder
| 24CA14 | sufficiency of the evidence; obstructing official business; R.C. 2921.31(A); hampers or impedes; substantial stoppage | Hess | Ross |
6/12/2025
|
6/18/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2156 |
State v. Paul
| 24CA20 | Attempted burglary; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; physical facts rule; sentencing error | Hess | Washington |
6/10/2025
|
6/13/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2088 |
In re A.P.
| 25CA702 | Permanent custody-trial court's judgments placing children in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Abele | Vinton |
6/9/2025
|
6/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2125 |
State v. Tucker
| 23CA4042 | CRIMINAL-SUPPRESSION-SUFFICIENCY-MANIFEST WEIGHT-MARKED LANES VIOLATION - The defendant's convictions for possession and trafficking in marijuana, which flowed from a traffic stop, are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence where his vehicle was stopped as a result of law enforcement observing him drive outside of marked lanes in violation of R.C. 4511.33(A)(1). | Smith | Scioto |
6/6/2025
|
6/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2108 |
State v. Hodges
| 24CA4061 | Sufficient evidence supported appellant's convictions; convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence; trial court did not commit reversible error when it accepted a jury instruction after closing arguments; trial court did not commit reversible error when it denied trial counsel's request for a jury instruction regarding mere presence; and cumulative effect of trial court's errors did not warrant reversal. | Abele | Scioto |
6/3/2025
|
6/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-2050 |
State v. Norris
| 24CA1 | sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; self-defense; ineffective assistance of counsel; jail call; competency evaluation; inconsistent verdicts | Hess | Highland |
5/29/2025
|
6/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1976 |
In re T.M.
| 25CA5 | permanent custody; manifest weight; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(b); R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); best interest; legally secure permanent placement | Hess | Highland |
5/29/2025
|
6/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1977 |
James v. James
| 24CA1207 | divorce; property division; jurisdiction; Civ.R. 75(F) | Hess | Adams |
5/28/2025
|
6/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1975 |
State v. Robinson
| 23CA5 & 23CA6 | Resisting arrest; operating a vehicle impaired ("OVI"); no contest plea; waiver; forfeiture; plain error; ineffective assistance of counsel; motion to suppress; Fourth Amendment; parked vehicle; consensual encounter; community caretaking exception; traffic stop; investigatory stop; field sobriety tests; reasonable articulable suspicion; probable cause; totality of the circumstances; Crim.R. 12(C)(3); Crim.R. 12(H) | Wilkin | Athens |
5/22/2025
|
5/1/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1537 |
Worthy v. Hawthorne
| 23CA27 | Manifest weight of the evidence; prescriptive easement; clear and convincing evidence; abandonment; stare decisis | Wilkin | Lawrence |
5/22/2025
|
5/29/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1941 |
State v. Gutierrez
| 24CA24 | validity of guilty plea; Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a); mandatory minimum fine; Reagan Tokes Law; mandatory prison term; eligibility for community control; motion to withdraw guilty plea; R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) | Hess | Ross |
5/22/2025
|
5/27/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1884 |
State v. Smith
| 24CA39 | guilty plea; knowing, intelligent, and voluntary; Crim.R. 11(C)(2); forfeiture | Hess | Ross |
5/22/2025
|
5/27/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1885 |
State v. Dalton
| 24CA4078 | sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; felonious assault; R.C. 2903.11(A)(1); self-defense; violating a protection order; R.C. 2919.27(A)(1); recklessly | Hess | Scioto |
5/20/2025
|
5/22/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1840 |
State v. Lucas
| 23CA4018 | Hybrid Representation, Motion to Suppress, Pro Se Litigant, Waiver of Counsel, Crim.R. 44, Odor of Marijuana, Standby Counsel, Right to Self-Representation, Definition of Seizure, Pacing, Mere Following Does Not Constitute Seizure | Wilkin | Scioto |
5/20/2025
|
5/28/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1918 |
Pryor v. Pryor
| 24CA10 | partition; subject-matter jurisdiction; res judicata; due process | Hess | Washington |
5/19/2025
|
5/23/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1854 |
State v. Miller
| 23CA15 | CRIMINAL-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE-DEFENSE OF OTHERS-SUFFICIENCY-CONCEDED ERROR-REAGAN TOKES LAW-R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(C) NOTIFICATIONS - Trial counsel's failure to object to incomplete defense of others instruction and failure to request a lesser included offense instruction did not result in ineffective assistance of counsel; appellant's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence; the matter is remanded for resentencing due to the trial court's failure to provide R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) notifications as required by the Reagan Tokes Law; the State concedes that a clerical error contained in the final judgment entry requires correction on remand. | Smith | Highland |
5/19/2025
|
5/28/2025
| 2025-Ohio-1920 |
|