|
|
In re W.C.
| 26CA1244, 26CA1247 | Permanent custody-Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Adams |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3431 |
|
State v. McCormick
| 24CA11 | CRIMINAL-EXCITED UTTERANCE-CONFRONTATION CLAUSE - The victim's statements regarding ongoing sexual abuse and her fear of returning home that were made in response to questions by school officials were properly admitted pursuant to the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule; the admission of the victim's out-of-court statements did not violate the confrontation clause where the victim testified at trial and was subject to full and fair cross-examination and where their admission alternatively constituted harmless error; appellant's convictions for 28 counts of rape were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Smith | Gallia |
8/26/2026
|
9/9/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3528 |
|
State v. Miller
| 25CA7 | Appellant entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. | Abele | Jackson |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3432 |
|
In re R.W.
| 26CA4180 | Permanent custody-Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Scioto |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3433 |
|
Messer v. Lucero
| 25CA4117 | manifest weight of the evidence; fraudulent misrepresentation; negligent misrepresentation; justifiable reliance; apparent reason to doubt the veracity of the representation; summary judgment; unargued ground | Hess | Scioto |
8/25/2026
|
9/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3412 |
|