|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Rebarchek
| 5-21-02; 5-21-03 | Statute allowing indefinite sentece does not facially violate the constitution. | Willamowski | Hancock |
9/13/2021
|
9/13/2021
| 2021-Ohio-3142 |
|
State v. Hardy
| 1-20-36 | Under State v. Pendleton, 2020-Ohio-6833, a trial court may not sentence a defendant for trafficking in five grams but less than ten grams of heroin and for trafficking in five grams but less than ten grams of a fentanyl-related compound when only 7.15 grams of a heroin-fenanyl compound changed hands. | Willamowski | Allen |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2977 |
|
State v. Salyers
| 1-20-55 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's petition for postconviction relief without a hearing. | Miller | Allen |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2978 |
|
State v. Thompson
| 9-20-35 | Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant-appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Miller | Marion |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2979 |
|
State v. Richard
| 9-20-36 | Defendant-appellant’s corrupting-another-with-drugs conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant’s constitutional right a speedy trial was not violated. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion for severance. Defendant-appellant’s sentence is not contrary to law. | Zimmerman | Marion |
8/30/2021
|
8/30/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2980 |
|
State v. Barnhart
| 12-20-08 | The trial court did not err in applying the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law to Appellant’s case. Appellant failed to demonstrate that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the unconstitutionality of the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law. | Shaw | Putnam |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2874 |
|
State v. Robinson
| 2-20-20 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that the appropriate foundation was laid for State’s Exhibits 8 and 9; that those exhibits were properly authenticated; and thereafter admitted into evidence. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal. The defendant-appellant’s aggravated-trafficking-in-drugs conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Auglaize |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2871 |
|
Sullinger v. Reed
| 6-20-14 | A tenant in common with an undivided interest may lease his or her rights to enter and possess the common property to a third party. | Willamowski | Hardin |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2872 |
|
State v. Bortree
| 8-20-67 | Statute of limitations for attempted aggravated murder had not passed; appellant did not establish prejudicial preindictment delay; trial court did not err by denying various suppression issues; conviction was supported by the evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Shaw | Logan |
8/23/2021
|
8/23/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2873 |
|
In re G.S.
| 8-20-04; 8-20-05; 8-20-06 | Because in this instance the juvenile court’s judgment entry of adjudication does not include a disposition, we conclude that the judgment is not a final, appealable order. | Shaw | Logan |
8/16/2021
|
8/16/2021
| 2021-Ohio-2804 |
|