|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Dearmond
| 8-21-43 | As the issue of restitution was still pending before the trial court, we lack jurisdiction over the matter. | Shaw | Logan |
7/5/2022
|
7/5/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2324 |
|
State v. Hecox
| 15-21-09 | Hecox did not demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Hecox did not demonstrate that trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial. | Shaw | Van Wert |
7/5/2022
|
7/5/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2325 |
|
Lima Refining Co. v. Linde Gas N. Am., L.L.C.
| 1-22-08 | A trial court may dismiss a declaratory judgment action pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) if no justiciable controversy is presented in the complaint. | Willamowski | Allen |
6/27/2022
|
6/27/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2185 |
|
State v. McPheron
| 2-22-01 | The trial court did not err in imposing McPheron's maximum sentence. | Shaw | Auglaize |
6/27/2022
|
6/27/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2186 |
|
State v. Miller
| 8-22-04 | Sentence imposed by the trial court was not unduly harsh or excessive and was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. | Willamowski | Logan |
6/27/2022
|
6/27/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2187 |
|
State v. Haley
| 9-22-04 | In order to prolong a traffic stop to accommodate the arrival of a canine unit, a police officer must have a reasonable articulable suspicion to extend the detention. | Willamowski | Marion |
6/27/2022
|
6/27/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2188 |
|
State v. Jones
| 1-21-61 | Conviction for domestic violence was supported by the evidence where defendant struck victim in the foot and victim testified that it caused her pain. | Shaw | Allen |
6/21/2022
|
6/21/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2089 |
|
Lewis v. Lewis
| 5-21-32 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion when determining the value of plaintiff-appellee's dentistry practice. The trial court did not err in the division of marital property under R.C. 3105.171. | Miller | Hancock |
6/21/2022
|
6/21/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2090 |
|
In re E.M.
| 5-21-35 | Trial court did not err in denying the motion of foster parents to intervene when they were not acting in loco parentis, but as foster parents. Transfer of jurisdiction pursuant to Indian Child Welfare Act was correct when no good cause for denying the transfer was presented. | Willamowski | Hancock |
6/21/2022
|
6/21/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2091 |
|
State v. Thompson
| 8-21-37 | Appellant did not establish that his sentence was clearly and convincingly contrary to law. | Shaw | Logan |
6/21/2022
|
6/21/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2092 |
|
Thiel's Wheels, Inc. v. State Route 30, Ltd.
| 16-21-06 | Trial court did not err in granting judgment in favor of Plaintiff based on Defendant's breach of contract. | Shaw | Wyandot |
6/21/2022
|
6/21/2022
| 2022-Ohio-2093 |
|
State v. Freeman
| 1-21-17, 1-21-18 | Because the indefinite-sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law are not unconstitutional, defendant-appellant's sentence is neither unsupported by the record nor contrary to law. | Miller | Allen |
6/13/2022
|
6/13/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1991 |
|
State v. Jordan
| 14-21-21 | In certain cases, the defendant bears the burden of proving at the suppression hearing that the challenged governmental action constituted a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Because defendant-appellee failed to carry his burden of proving that the helicopter surveillance of his property was a Fourth Amendment "search," the trial court erred by granting defendant-appellee's motion to suppress evidence. | Miller | Union |
6/13/2022
|
6/13/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1992 |
|
State v. Davis
| 2-21-10 | Trial court did not err in applying the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law to Appellant's case. Appellant failed to demonstrate that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the unconstitutionality of the indefinite sentencing provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law. Trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences. | Shaw | Auglaize |
6/6/2022
|
6/6/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1900 |
|
State v. Roesener
| 14-21-26 | Trial court's determination that defendant was guilty of domestic violence was supported by sufficient evidence. | Willamowski | Union |
6/6/2022
|
6/6/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1901 |
|
State v. Sanders
| 1-21-47 | Convictions for felonious assault and kidnapping were not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant did not establish that the Reagan Tokes Law was unconstitutional. Trial court's statement to pro se defendant that cross-examination was limited was improper; however, record does not establish any relevant questions defendant was prevented from asking. | Shaw | Allen |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1806 |
|
State v. Espinoza
| 1-21-48 | Defendant-appellant’s sentence is contrary to law because his prior R.C. 2901.01(A)(9) offense-of-violence convictions render him ineligible for the mandated imprisonment at a non-ORDC facility under R.C. 2929.34. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that defendant-appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community-control sanctions. | Zimmerman | Allen |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1807 |
|
State v. Blankenship
| 3-21-20 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking defendant-appellant's community control. The trial court made the required findings regarding the imposition of consecutive sentences. However, those findings were not incorporated into the sentencing entry. Judgment affirmed and cause remanded with instructions. | Zimmerman | Crawford |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1808 |
|
State v. Sampsel
| 3-21-24 | The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Crawford |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1809 |
|
State v. Driscol
| 8-21-36 | Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying presentence motion to withdraw no contest pleas. | Shaw | Logan |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1810 |
|
State v. Coleman
| 8-21-42 | Pursuant to R.C. 2953.08(G)(1), an appellate court may increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence if the sentence is clearly and convincingly contrary to law or unsupported by the record. | Willamowski | Logan |
5/31/2022
|
5/31/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1811 |
|
State v. Woten
| 1-21-49 | Defendant-appellant's OVI (under Count Three) and Aggravated-vehicular-assault convictions (under Counts Six and Seven) are based upon sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Allen |
5/23/2022
|
5/23/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1710 |
|
State v. Nurein
| 14-21-18 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by calling defendant-appellant's ex-wife as a court's witness under Evid.R. 614(A). The trial court did not commit plain error by admitting video footage of defendant-appellant's son identifying him as the perpetrator of the crime. The trial court did not deprive defendant-appellant of his right to present a complete defense. Defendant-appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. | Miller | Union |
5/23/2022
|
5/23/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1711 |
|
State v. Liles
| 1-21-60 | Trial court did not err in dismissing untimely, successive postconviction petition for lack of jurisdiction when requirement of R.C. 2953.23 not established. | Shaw | Allen |
5/22/2022
|
5/23/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1713 |
|
State v. York
| 14-21-14 | The trial court did not commit plain error by conducting a single trial on all the charges pending against defendant-appellant. The trial court did not err by allowing plaintiff-appellee to introduce other-acts evidence. Insufficient evidence supports defendant-appellant's convictions for two counts of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(5), but sufficient evidence supports defendant-appellant's conviction for one count of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(c). To the extent sufficient evidence supports defendant-appellant's convictions, defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. | Miller | Union |
5/16/2022
|
5/16/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1626 |
|
State v. Ball
| Case No. 1-21-16 | Conviction for, inter alia, possession of cocaine supported by sufficient evidence. Motion for mistrial denied by trial court was not an abuse of discretion. Special jury instruction concerning credibility of specific witness; Reagan Tokes Act. | Shaw | Allen |
5/9/2022
|
5/9/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1549 |
|
McAdoo v. McAdoo
| 1-22-01 | A person may not be held in civil contempt if the prior court order was ambiguous. The determination of whether a prior order is ambiguous is reviewed de novo on appeal. If the trial court interprets an ambiguous order, the interpretation is subject to an abuse of discretion standard on appeal. | Willamowski | Allen |
5/9/2022
|
5/9/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1550 |
|
State v. Murphy
| 6-21-11 | Trial court erred in imposing a sentence consecutive to that of a federal case in which no prison term had been imposed at the time of sentencing in this case. | Willamowski | Hardin |
5/9/2022
|
5/9/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1551 |
|
Johnson v. ContiTech USA, Inc.
| 14-21-23 | The trial court erred by granting summary judgment for employer on Appellant's claim for workers' compensation benefits for psychiatric condition allegedly caused by physical at-work injuries. A genuine issue of fact exists regarding whether a causal connection between the psychiatric condition and the physical injuries. | Shaw | Union |
5/9/2022
|
5/9/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1552 |
|
State v. Carter
| 1-21-19 & 1-21-20 | Convictions for Rape were not against the weight of the evidence. Trial court did not abuse its discretion by joining cases for trial, and trial court did not abuse its discretion by briefly closing courtroom during playing of a lewd video where no testimony was elicited during that time. | Shaw | Allen |
5/2/2022
|
5/2/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1444 |
|
State v. Greene
| 2-21-07 | The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress his chemical-breath test. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary determinations. The jury’s verdicts are based on sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Auglaize |
4/25/2022
|
4/25/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1357 |
|
Hall v. Crawford Cty. Job & Family Servs.
| 3-21-19 | The trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee as to plaintiff-appellant’s claims brought under Chapter 4112 of the Revised Code. | Zimmerman | Crawford |
4/25/2022
|
4/25/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1358 |
|
In re D.A.
| 4-21-15 | Delinquency adjudication for Gross Sexual Imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. | Shaw | Defiance |
4/25/2022
|
4/25/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1359 |
|
Henry Cty. Bank v. Toledo Radio, L.L.C.
| 7-21-09 | Under Civ.R. 6(C)(1), a movant may file a reply to a nonmovant's response within seven days after service of the nonmovant's response to the movant's initial motion. | Willamowski | Henry |
4/25/2022
|
4/25/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1360 |
|
Lind Media Co. v. Marion Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals
| 9-21-39 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by reversing defendant-appellant's decision denying plaintiff-appellee's application for a zoning permit because the trial court did not err by concluding that the language of the township's resolution is mandatory and that plaintiff-appellee is entitled to the permit. | Zimmerman | Marion |
4/25/2022
|
4/25/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1361 |
|
Israfil v. Mgt. & Training Corp.
| 9-21-31 | The trial court did not err by dismissing appellant's civil action for failing to comply with the affidavit requirements of R.C. 2969.25. | Miller | Marion |
4/18/2022
|
4/18/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1270 |
|
State v. Zeger
| 3-21-14 | Trial court did not err in revoking defendant's community control after defendant admitted to violating the terms of his sanctions on two separate occasions. | Willamowski | Crawford |
4/11/2022
|
4/11/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1202 |
|
State v. Hoskinson
| 15-21-10 | The Confrontation Clause is not violated where an analyst testifies at trial on direct and cross examination, in part, about a forensic report she wrote and produced before trial. | Willamowski | Van Wert |
4/11/2022
|
4/11/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1203 |
|
State v. Purdy
| 2-21-16 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to sua sponte order a hearing regarding defendant/appellant’s competency. | Zimmerman | Auglaize |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1131 |
|
In re J.A.
| 5-21-20 | Trial court's judgment terminating the parental rights was supported when the child had been in the custody of children's services for more than 12 out of a consecutive 22 month period and the termination was in the best interest of the child. | Willamowski | Hancock |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1132 |
|
In re Adoption of C.L.Y.
| 5-21-23 | Trial Court did not err in determining Father's consent was not required for adoption petition to proceed. R.C. 3107.07(A). | Shaw | Hancock |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1133 |
|
Discover Bank v. Tudor
| 6-21-09 | Complaint was not barred due to failing to refile the case within one year of prior voluntary dismissal when the statute of limitations had not yet expired. Testimony of keeper of records is not hearsay pursuant to Evid.R. 803. Trial court properly considered defense of accord and satisfaction. | Willamowski | Hardin |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1134 |
|
State v. Galloway
| 7-21-07 | The October 1, 2021 judgment entry does not constitute a final appealable order. Therefore, we lack subject-matter appellate jurisdiction. Appeal dismissed. | Zimmerman | Henry |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1135 |
|
Kent v. Motorist Mut. Ins. Co.
| 8-21-44 | An insurance policy is an insurance contract. Accordingly, an insurance policy will be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties. | Willamowski | Logan |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1136 |
|
In re J.G.
| 8-21-45 | Trial court retained jurisdiction over juvenile where it terminated probation but retained other orders in full force and effect. | Shaw | Logan |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1137 |
|
In re Adoption of B.M.S.
| 11-21-06 | The trial court did not err by finding that respondent-appellant failed to file an objection to the petition for adoption. Judgment affirmed. | Zimmerman | Paulding |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1138 |
|
In re C.H.
| 14-21-20 | The Agency established the identity of C.H.'s biological mother at the permanent-custody hearing. The trial court's decision granting permanent custody to the Agency is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err by admitting exhibits that were created for the purpose of trial. | Miller | Union |
4/4/2022
|
4/4/2022
| 2022-Ohio-1139 |
|
Hanneman Family Funeral Homes & Crematorium v. Orians
| 1-21-05 | The trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of cross-appellants on plaintiff-appellant’s claims for tortious interference with contracts and business relationships and trade-secret violations against cross-appellants, its claims against Orians for conversion and defamation, and its claim against Chiles-Laman for ratification. Moreover, the trial court did not err by determining that plaintiff-appellant’s tort claims were not preempted by Ohio’s Uniform Trade Secret Act and by granting summary judgment in favor of cross-appellants as to their claim for conversion against plaintiff-appellant. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. | Zimmerman | Allen |
3/28/2022
|
3/28/2022
| 2022-Ohio-984 |
|
State v. Goins
| 1-21-29 | Defendant-appellant's patient-neglect conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Zimmerman | Allen |
3/28/2022
|
3/28/2022
| 2022-Ohio-985 |
|
In re D.H.
| 5-21-27; 5-21-28 | The delinquent child did not raise his constitutional argument before the trial court and failed to raise any plain-error argument on appeal. Thus, we decline to fashion one for him. Judgments affirmed. | Zimmerman | Hancock |
3/28/2022
|
3/28/2022
| 2022-Ohio-986 |
|