Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 142 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Emfinger 1-25-69Sufficiency of the Evidence; Attempted Illegal Use of a Minor in a Nudity-Oriented Material or Performance; R.C. 2907.323(A)(1); Attempt Crime; Nudity; R.C. 2907.01(H). The defendant-appellant’s conviction for attempted illegal use of a minor in a nudity-oriented material or performance is based on sufficient evidence. The State presented sufficient circumstantial evidence for a rational trier of fact to conclude that the defendant-appellant took a substantial step toward the commission of the offense and that he intended to solicit a photograph depicting nudity.ZimmermanAllen 9/8/2026 9/8/2026 2026-Ohio-3487
State v. Christen 1-26-18Motion to Suppress; Reasonable Articulable Suspicion. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant’s motion to suppress since the officer had reasonable articulable suspicion to expand the welfare check into a criminal investigation and to administer field sobriety tests.ZimmermanAllen 9/8/2026 9/8/2026 2026-Ohio-3488
State v. Moore 1-25-79Fourth Amendment; Terry frisk; pat-down; plain-feel doctrine; warrantless search and seizure; R.C. 2925.11(A); contraband. The trial court did not err in overruling defendant's motion to suppress contraband obtained during a warrantless pat-down search where the officer possessed reasonable suspicion that the defendant was armed and dangerous and the incriminating nature of the contraband was immediately apparent during the frisk.MillerAllen 9/8/2026 9/8/2026 2026-Ohio-3519
State v. Washington 1-25-30Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Defendant-appellant failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.MillerAllen 9/8/2026 9/8/2026 2026-Ohio-3520
Resor v. Dicke 2-26-02Motion to Dismiss; Civ.R. 41(B)(1); Notice; Opportunity to Defend; Civ.R. 6(C)(1); Response; Indirect Contempt. In general, Civ.R. 41(B)(1) applies to dismissals that are granted pursuant to Civ.R. 37(B). Civ.R. 41(B)(1) requires a litigant to have notice and a reasonable opportunity to defend against a dismissal before an involuntary dismissal is ordered. Civ.R. 6(C)(1) gives a party fourteen days to respond to a motion that is not a motion for summary judgment. Civ.R. 6(C)(1) reflects the due process principle that parties have a right to be heard prior to the issuance of a decision. An indirect contempt citation addresses conduct that does not occur in the presence of the trial court. Since the trial court is not a witness to acts committed outside its presence, the trial court must give a party prior notice and an opportunity to be heard before finding that party in indirect contempt.WillamowskiAuglaize 9/8/2026 9/8/2026 2026-Ohio-3521
12345678910...>>