Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 208 rows. Rows per page:

State v. Cox

30681, 30682, 30683

The trial court did not err in sentencing appellant. Appellant’s sentence on each offense was within the statutory range, and the trial court considered the purposes and principles of sentencing and the seriousness of crime and recidivism factors. Judgments affirmed.

Huffman

Montgomery

7/24/2026

2026-Ohio-2851

State v. Avery

2025-CA-50

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s request to stipulate to his prior felony convictions during his jury trial on counts of having weapons while under disability and other firearm-related offenses. Appellant’s counsel did not object to the State’s evidence of appellant’s priors or offer to stipulate until the State had already introduced evidence of three of appellant’s four prior convictions. The proof of the prior convictions was not unfairly prejudicial. The record does not support appellant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective by not stipulating to the prior convictions before trial, because appellant has not established prejudice. Judgment affirmed.

Hanseman

Clark

7/24/2026

2026-Ohio-2848

State v. Nalls

30691

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s successive petition for postconviction relief where (1) he failed to meet his burden to show he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the facts upon which he relied to present his claims; (2) he did not show through clear and convincing evidence that, but for a constitutional error at trial, no reasonable factfinder would have found him guilty; and (3) his claims are barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed.

Lewis

Montgomery

7/24/2026

2026-Ohio-2854

Royaldavid Ent., L.L.C. v. Townsend

30736

Because appellant was personally served with the complaint and failed to file an answer or otherwise enter an appearance, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting appellee’s motion for default judgment without holding an oral hearing on the motion. Judgment affirmed.

Huffman

Montgomery

7/24/2026

2026-Ohio-2856

State v. Miller

2025-CA-36

The appeal is moot because appellant has completely served the prison sentences that she challenges on appeal. Appeal dismissed.

Lewis

Champaign

7/24/2026

2026-Ohio-2853

...