|
|
State v. Robinson
| CA2025-03-026 | Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel by his trial counsel failing to file a motion to dismiss alleging a violation of his speedy-trial rights where appellant had executed two time waivers of unlimited duration, for which appellant never rescinded by filing an objection and demand with the trial court that the State bring him to trial, as any such motion would have been futile, nor did appellant receive ineffective assistance in the way in which his trial counsel chose to cross-examine the State's witnesses who testified against him as that falls under the ambit of trial strategy that does not form the basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. | Piper | Butler |
6/15/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2221 |
|
State v. Birt
| CA2025-05-041 | Defendant appeals denial of his motion for leave to move for a new trial. Defendant convicted of sex offenses involving minor daughter. Defendant supported motion with affidavits indicating daughter recanted. Trial court abused discretion in denying motion. Defendant submitted affidavits demonstrating that Defendant could not have obtained the recantation evidence within 120 days of the jury verdicts. No decision on merits was rendered on the recantation issue in earlier postconviction filing and res judicata was inapplicable. | Byrne | Butler |
6/15/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2224 |
|
Suwareh v. Nwankwo
| CA2025-09-106 | A mother's failure to file a transcript of the proceedings before a magistrate limited appellate review of factual issues to whether the trial court abused its discretion in applying the law to the magistrate's factual findings. Here, the court did not abuse its discretion in terminating shared parenting, naming the father the residential parent, or holding mother in contempt of court. Events that occurred after the trial court rendered its decision and after mother filed her notice of appeal are not part of the record on appeal. | Hendrickson | Butler |
6/15/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2225 |
|
State v. Ramirez
| CA2025-12-130 | Trial court's imposition of consecutive felony sentences was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law because the court made the required sentencing findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). | M. Powell | Butler |
6/15/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2226 |
|
State v. Flynn
| CA2025-11-092; CA2025-11-093 | Anders no error. | Per Curiam | Clermont |
6/15/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2227 |
|