Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 256 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Johnston v. State 12AP-1022Because Mansaray v. State, 138 Ohio St.3d 277, 2014-Ohio-750, bars appellee's claim for wrongful imprisonment, as a matter of law, the trial court erred when it granted appellee's motion for summary judgment and declared appellant a wrongfully imprisoned individual. Judgment reversed.SadlerFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4761
State v. Neil 14AP-981; 15AP-594Appellant was convicted of a series of robberies committed in 2011 and 2012. The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a GPS tracking warrant; appellant failed to demonstrate that search warrant affidavit was insufficient or contained an intentional false statement. The trial court did not err by granting motion to join indictment containing charges from 2011 robberies with indictment containing charges from 2012 robberies for trial because evidence of the crimes in each indictment would have been admissible in separate trials under Evid.R. 404(B). The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence because there were sufficient similarities between the robberies for the jury to conclude that appellant committed each of the crimes.DorrianFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4762
State v. Sims 14AP-1025Medicaid in-home provider's conviction for theft supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4763
Whitmer v. Zochowski 15AP-52; 15AP-65; 15AP-60The trial court did not err in granting plaintiff's Civ.R. 15(B) motion to amend the pleadings to conform to the evidence when plaintiff introduced evidence regarding an unpleaded issue and defendant did not object or establish any prejudice. The trial court erred in allowing the reading of a deposition at trial without a limiting instruction, but that error did not prejudice defendants. The trial court did not err in submitting to the jury "yes or no" interrogatories designed to determine which of the defendant physician's multiple negligent acts was actually negligent. The trial court did not err in excluding evidence that alcohol intoxication caused plaintiff to crash his automobile. The trial court did not err in granting plaintiff prejudment interest under R.C. 1343.03(C).KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4764
State ex rel. Howard v. State Emp. Relations Bd. 15AP-220Mandamus denied - Record supports the factual findings. SERB did not abuse its discretion in finding the absence of probable cause for an unfair labor practice.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4765
State v. Jones 15AP-596Convictions supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence; trial court did not err by not holding a competency hearing where defendant did not raise the competency issue at trial and any error in not holding a hearing would have been harmless because no indications of incompetency in the record.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4766
Zeidman v. Zeidman 15AP-783The trial court did not abuse its discretion in its distribution of marital property, in its award of spousal support, or in its determination that both parties shall pay their own attorney fees.Luper SchusterFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4767
Hughes v. Ohio Bd. of Nursing 15AP-786Permanent revocation of nursing license affirmed; no error because board did not rely on evidence which nurse claimed to have prejudiced him.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4768
Senco Brands, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. 15AP-796Trial court did not err when it concluded that 11 U.S.C. 363(f) and the bankruptcy court order did not preempt the determination of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services that appellant was a successor-in-interest to the debtor pursuant to R.C. 4141.24(G). Trial court did not err when it found that reliable, probative, and substantial evidence supported the determnation of the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission that, at the time of the transfer of the debtor's trade or business to appellant, both employers were under substantially common management for purpose of R.C. 4141.24(G). Trial court did not err when it upheld the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission that R.C. 4141.21 prohibitied Ohio Department of Job and Family Services from releasing information to appellant concerning other Ohio employers. Judgment affirmed.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4769
State v. Kendrick 15AP-835Trial court did not err by sentencing defendant to consecutive prison terms for multiple R.C. 2941.145 firearm specifications.KlattFranklin 6/30/2016 7/1/2016 2016-Ohio-4770
12345678910...>>