Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 34 rows. Rows per page: 
1234
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Wike v. Indus. Comm. 14AP-213Relator's request for writ of mandamus denied; some evidence supported commission's determination that relator's ability to walk with a brace precludes her from recovering a scheduled loss award for loss of use of her left leg.KlattFranklin 2/26/2015 2/26/2015 2015-Ohio-681
State v. Thompson 14AP-488Defendant's convictions for aggravated robbery, robbery and attendant firearm specifications were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.BryantFranklin 2/24/2015 2/24/2015 2015-Ohio-655
Nkanginieme v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid 14AP-596Pursuant to R.C. 5164.38(C), (D), and (E), the Ohio Department of Medicaid's suspension of a Medicaid provider agreement and payments is not subject to an R.C. 119.12 administrative appeal where the suspension is based on "credible allegations of fraud." An appeal improperly brought "pursuant to Chapter 119" deprives the common pleas court of subject-matter jurisdiction over the merits of the case, rendering due process arguments moot. The judgment of the court of common pleas dismissing the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is affirmed.SadlerFranklin 2/24/2015 2/24/2015 2015-Ohio-656
Hussain v. Sheppard 14AP-686Because the tenants failed to obtain a stay of execution and were evicted from the premises pursuant to writ of restitution, their appeal of the trial court's judgment granting restitution of the premises to the landlord is moot.BryantFranklin 2/24/2015 2/24/2015 2015-Ohio-657
State ex rel. Perez v. Indus. Comm. 14AP-394Claimant received temporary total disability compensation to which he was not entitled, but fraud was not demonstrated.TyackFranklin 2/19/2015 2/19/2015 2015-Ohio-588
State v. Nichols 14AP-498Pursuant to State v. Pariag, 137 Ohio St.3d 81, 2013-Ohio-4010, when the court considers expungement of dismissed charges that arise out of the same incident as a non-sealable conviction, it must hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the dismissed charges arise "as a result of or in connection with the same act" as the non-sealable conviction. Because the trial court did not hold such a hearing before sealing the record of the dismissed charges, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded.SadlerFranklin 2/17/2015 2/18/2015 2015-Ohio-581
State v. Phelps 14AP-4The trial court did not err in admitting statements by the victim and the judgment was not against the manifest weight or insufficient and appellant's counsel was not ineffective. Therefore, we affirmed appellant's conviction of murder with a firearm specification.BrownFranklin 2/12/2015 2/12/2015 2015-Ohio-539
State ex rel. Par Acquisition Co. v. Bur. of Workers' Comp. 13AP-933Failure to provide evidence at the administrative level prevents issuing a writ of mandamus.TyackFranklin 2/12/2015 2/12/2015 2015-Ohio-499
State v. Montgomery 13AP-1091Application for reconsideration/clarification granted to clarify that after a petitioner has established substantive grounds for relief and the need for an evidentiary hearing, it is within the sound discretion of the trial court whether to grant some limited form of discovery in order to permit additional factual development of post-conviction claims.TyackFranklin 2/10/2015 2/11/2015 2015-Ohio-500
State v. Nyarko 14AP-138Res judicata bars consideration of claims regarding determination of restitution that were not raised in a direct appeal.KlattFranklin 2/10/2015 2/11/2015 2015-Ohio-501
1234