Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 299 rows. Rows per page:

06/05/2026 Case Announcements

Merit decisions with opinions.

6/5/2026

2026-Ohio-2100

06/05/2026 Case Announcements #2

Motion and procedural rulings.

6/5/2026

2026-Ohio-2120

Disciplinary Counsel v. Avery

2025-1635

Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct—Respondent’s objections overruled—Public reprimand.

Per Curiam

Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2065

6/5/2026

2026-Ohio-2065

In re Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.

2024-1505

Public utilities—Public Utilities Commission did not err in permitting utility to recover from customers through rates the costs associated with retiring its propane caverns—Costs of retiring propane caverns recoverable by utility under R.C. 4909.15(A)(4) as a cost of rendering public-utility service—Commission’s order affirmed.

Brunner, J.

Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2064

6/5/2026

2026-Ohio-2064

State ex rel. Bates v. Clancy

2025-1274

Prohibition—Because appellant’s sex offenses were committed prior to effective date of Ohio’s Adam Walsh Act, he was subject to Ohio’s Megan’s Law and appellee trial-court judge did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to classify him under Megan’s Law—Appellant cannot show that judge patently and unambiguously lacked jurisdiction to classify him after his sentencing as an aggravated sexually oriented offender, because a trial court retains jurisdiction to conduct sex-offender-classification proceedings after sentencing—Appellant had an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law by way of appeal to challenge his sex-offender classification—Court of appeals’ judgment granting judge’s motion to dismiss affirmed.

Per Curiam

Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2048

6/4/2026

2026-Ohio-2048

...