|
January 14, 2022 Adams v. DeWine
January 12, 2022 League of Women Voters v. Ohio Redistricting Comm.
January 4, 2022 DuBose v. McGuffey
December 23, 2021 State ex rel. Ellis v. Cleveland Police Forensic Laboratory State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Revision
December 22, 2021 State v. Harrison State v. Misch
December 21, 2021 Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cleveland State ex rel. Ogle v. Hocking Cty. Common Pleas Court
December 16, 2021 State ex rel. Ohio Stands Up!, Inc. v. DeWine
December 15, 2021 Disciplinary Counsel v. Porter
December 14, 2021 State ex rel. Maxwell v. Brice
November 24, 2021 Snay v. Burr State v. Pilkington State v. Lamb State v. Baber |
|
January 28, 2022 In Stevens v. Hill, the Court denied appellant Jeffrey Stevens’ request for appointment of counsel. January 27, 2022 The Court dismissed State ex rel. Richard G. Johnson Co., L.P.A. v. Sheehan after appellant Richard Johnson failed to file a required merit brief. January 26, 2022 In League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Ohio Redistricting Comm., Bennett v. Ohio Redistricting Comm., and Ohio Organizing Collaborative v. Ohio Redistricting Comm., the Court ordered respondent Ohio Redistricting Commission to file a response, if any, to objections to the commission’s revised map no later than 12 p.m. on Friday, Jan. 28. January 25, 2022 In In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co. to Establish a Standard Service Offer, the Court ordered the parties to file a response, if any, by Jan. 31 to appellant Office of the Consumers’ Counsel’s request to strike materials not in the record submitted by cross-appellant AES, parent company of Dayton Power & Light, and strike the portion of the company’s brief referencing the materials. View Complete Second Announcement » In State v. Jackson, the Court approved a request by the Ohio Attorney General’s Office to divide oral argument time with appellee Hamilton County Prosecutor’s Office. January 24, 2022 In Neuro-Communication Servs., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., the Court denied a request by amicus curiae Queens Tower Restaurant to admit newly discovered evidence. The Court granted petitioner Cincinnati Insurance’s request to strike Queens Tower Restaurant’s supplemental brief as improper. The Court also granted an alternative motion to admit newly discovered evidence. View Complete Second Announcement » The Court published official versions of 12 opinions, which were previously released as slip opinions. January 21, 2022 In Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Buzzelli, the Court denied respondent Russell Buzzelli’s request for a continuance. |
