﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>BOCGD Advisory Opinions</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/Boards/BOC/Advisory_Opinions</link><description>BOCGD Advisory Opinions</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:59:24 -0400</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:59:24 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Advisory Opinion Addresses Identifying Non-Lawyer Employees</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2012/BOCadvisoryOp_061412.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">22144920-2cc9-493c-94a6-64770e17d8da</guid><description>Law firm letterhead and websites may list the names of non-lawyer employees if their status is clearly identified, according to a Supreme Court of Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline advisory opinion.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:58:41 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion Addresses Secret Recording by Lawyer</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2012/BOCadvisoryOp_061312.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a9a97f3-d263-4de6-a28a-b5e52f2e1d8e</guid><description>In an advisory opinion issued last week, the Supreme Court of Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline found that a legal but secret recording of a conversation by a lawyer is not inherently unethical.</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:58:08 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion Addresses Bar Association Elections Question</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2011/BOCadvisoryOp_121511.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">e6c9597e-2e2b-4c07-8d1a-53511f20baaa</guid><description>A judge may not recommend or endorse a candidate for a bar association elective office, according to a Supreme Court of Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline advisory opinion.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:24:15 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion Answers Multijurisdictional Practice Question</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2011/BOCadvisoryOp_101711.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">a77543dd-63db-4d45-af29-47545cf51b03</guid><description>Out-of-state debt settlement lawyers are not authorized to provide legal services on a temporary basis to Ohio clients, according to a Supreme Court of Ohio Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline advisory opinion.</description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:30:28 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Veteran Lawyer Named to Lead Lawyer Discipline Board</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2011/BOCLeadership_041111.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">81d4ec35-c09f-4e65-962e-f9784baf9eaf</guid><description>As the board that oversees the disciplinary system for Ohio lawyers and judges prepares to say goodbye to its highly respected longtime secretary, a smooth transition will be aided by the naming this week of a veteran Ohio lawyer and ethics expert as the new secretary.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:48:58 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion: Judges May 'Friend' 'Tweet' if Proper Caution Exercised</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_120810.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">ba177dc5-1f05-4aa8-bc45-670ae2fd9734</guid><description>In one of the most comprehensive and detailed examinations in the nation, the Supreme Court of Ohio’s disciplinary board has issued an advisory opinion examining the ethical implications of judges using social media sites like Facebook and Twitter.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:55:56 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion Answers Contingent Fee, Power of Attorney Question</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_102010.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">4d94a54a-d439-4746-97e8-413b966e6adb</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline has issued an advisory opinion addressing a lawyer’s use of a contingent fee agreement in which a client grants a power of attorney to the lawyer as to all aspects of a legal matter.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:04:42 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion: Charitable Contribution in Lieu of Community Control Not Proper</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_070710.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">39397640-ae37-466d-b4b0-571e09e3de77</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline has issued an advisory opinion concerning making a charitable contribution in lieu of serving the community control sanction of community service.</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:18:05 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Advisory Opinion: Attempt to Hinder Disciplinary Process by Lawyer Improper</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_062910.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">3de146d5-36b5-422f-affd-93a6dbb2ca07</guid><description>In a recent advisory opinion, the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline advised lawyers that it is improper to require a current or former client to withdraw a disciplinary grievance or to refrain from filing one as part of a legal malpractice claim settlement.</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:47:33 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Grievances &amp; Discipline Board Releases Advisory Opinion</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_041910.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">0cb8115f-91f8-4bdb-974b-bcff7fdf9eab</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline has issued an advisory opinion about whether a lawyer’s notes must be turned over to a client when requested.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:15:49 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Grievances &amp; Discipline Board Releases Advisory Opinion</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2010/BOCadvisoryOp_021610.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">9bad3474-e6d5-4a3a-bbcc-883c832eddbf</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline has issued an advisory opinion concerning the inclusion of an area of practice or specialization in a law firm name.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:51:25 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Grievances &amp; Discipline Board Releases Advisory Opinions</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2009/advisoryOpins_121709.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">c344c1a0-8b87-4866-ad50-e695d7c91f91</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline recently issued three advisory opinions concerning charitable contributions, thanking jurors for their service and charging for outsourced legal services.</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:00:43 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Grievances &amp; Discipline Board Releases Advisory Opinion</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2009/BOCAdvisoryOp_102209.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">ce6ad18f-170c-4da5-aa87-e4478a1c759a</guid><description>A recent advisory opinion from the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline advises judicial candidates to be specific when referencing a political party endorsement in person or in advertising.</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Grievances &amp; Discipline Board Releases Advisory Opinions</title><link>http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/PIO/news/2009/BOCadvisoryOp_082409.asp</link><guid isPermaLink="false">c9ececbc-188b-4454-9f6e-872b74859842</guid><description>Two recent advisory opinions from the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances &amp; Discipline offer guidance on outsourcing legal or support services and whether a newly appointed domestic relations magistrate can continue to serve as a city council member.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:30:36 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>