Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 46 rows. Rows per page: 
12345
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Halliday v. Bd. of Dirs. of the Mental Health & Recovery Bd. of Erie & Ottawa Ctys. E-19-011Summary judgment. Defamation/libel. Public official. Actual malice.SingerErie 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-702
Ouellette v. Ouellette E-19-017Judgment affirmed, in part and reversed in part, where trial court had jurisdiction to consider 60(B) motion for relief from judgment, and did not abuse its discretion in finding a timely motion demonstrating a meritorious defense and mutual mistake, but lacked authority to modify the property order by changing the source of the lump sum payment, with remand necessary to consider appropriate remedy under Civ.R. 60(B).ZmudaErie 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-705
State v. Clark L-19-1068The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. SingerLucas 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-700
Lowe v. Local Union No. 14 U.A.W. L-19-1042Appellant’s premises liability claim was subject to dismissal on summary judgment where the hazards that allegedly caused appellant’s injuries were open and obvious.ZmudaLucas 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-703
State v. Morris L-18-1187Trial court properly convicted appellant for two felonious assault offenses. Judgment affirmed. Felonious assault, sufficiency of evidence, Alford plea, felony sentencingOsowikLucas 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-704
Manning v. FCA US, L.L.C. L-19-1144Trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to determine the action; res judicata bars a second motion for an additional allowance for an injury based on a different theory of causation.PietrykowskiLucas 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-706
State v. Baldwin WD-18-064Appellant’s convictions of receiving stolen property and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity affirmed. Circumstantial evidence was presented that appellant knew or should have known that trailers had been stolen and that appellant sold 45 stolen trailers to co-defendant for resale to third parties. Court properly imposed costs of prosecution and was not required to make a finding of ability to pay.MayleWood 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-699
State v. Drain WD-19-015Appellee’s offer of a package deal plea bargain was not improper. Judgment affirmed.OsowikWood 2/28/2020 2/28/2020 2020-Ohio-701
State v. Butler WD-19-011Trial court complied with all applicable sentencing requirements when it sentenced defendant to 17 months in jail following his guilty plea to assault. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to request a competency exam and/or to pursue a not guilty by reason of insanity defense where there was no evidence to support either.MayleWood 2/21/2020 2/21/2020 2020-Ohio-606
State v. Krauzer L-19-1018In a case involving a no contest plea to aggravated murder, appellant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and counsel was not ineffective in failing to request independent competency and sanity evaluations. Crim. R. 11; R.C. 2945.371.PietrykowskiLucas 2/21/2020 2/21/2020 2020-Ohio-608
12345