Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 220 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Anderson L-18-1003Based on authority of Baker and Lester, trial court did not err in denying motion to release as sentencing entry complied with Crim.R. 32(C). criminalSingerLucas 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3300
Holloway v. Bucher WD-18-014Oral agreement concerning a loan that required monthly payments is unenforceable under R.C. 1335.05 because the monthly payments would not pay the loan off within one year and the parties did not contemplate early payoff of the loan at the time the agreement was reached.JensenWood 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3301
State v. Parker L-17-1052Motion to suppress properly denied. Conviction supported by sufficient, manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. criminalOsowikLucas 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3302
Pippo v. Fitzgerald OT-17-026Trial court did not abuse its discretion for how it fashioned the jury instructions because they were correct, complete and factually warranted by the evidence in the case. Judgment affirmed. Negligence, proximate cause, expert opinion, probability, jury instructions, abuse of discretion, de novo review, civilOsowikOttawa 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3303
Quest Workforce Solutions, L.L.C. v. Job 1USA, Inc. L-17-1194, L-17-1246The trial court erred in awarding damages for a breach of contract because it excluded certain expenses that were proper under the parties’ profit sharing agreement. The trial court also erred in awarding prejudgment interest because it failed to determine the appropriate interest rate and the date when prejudgment interest began to accrue. CivilSingerLucas 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 2018-Ohio-3304
State v. Braswell L-16-1197Where testimonial evidence established that defendant exited victim's home within minutes of burglary, door had been forced open, items were missing, and defendant subsequently confessed, his conviction was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Despite multiple claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, defendant could not demonstrate that any impacted the outcome of the trial. OsowikLucas 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 2018-Ohio-3208
In re Estate of Watson L-17-1139Trial court abused its discretion when it denied appellants’ Civ.R. 60(B)(1) motion for relief from judgment. Judgment reversed. Wrongful death, settlement, distribution, statutory wrongful death beneficiaries, next of kin, notice, reasonable diligence, relief from judgment, abuse of discretion, de novo review, civilOsowikLucas 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 2018-Ohio-3209
Katz v. Katz L-17-1157Trial court erred in denying motion to compel arbitration where claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and misappropriation arose from LLC’s operating agreement and appellee was bound by agreement as substitute member, in place of ex-husband who continued to manage company. Non-arbitrable claims must be stayed pending arbitration of arbitrable claims. Orders denying motion to strike jury demand and to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction were not final appealable orders.MayleLucas 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 2018-Ohio-3210
State v. Leavell E-17-071Motion to vacate conviction barred by the doctrine of res judicata and because it was untimely.PietrykowskiErie 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 2018-Ohio-3211
Tillimon v. Moore L-18-1040, L-18-1041Remand is necessary for court to calculate, ascertain, and grant appropriate monetary damages for months appellant owned rental property. Post-argument motion to supplement record is denied.SingerLucas 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 2018-Ohio-3212