Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 145 rows. Rows per page: 
123
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re M.G. 25CA1216PERMANENT CUSTODY - Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence - Judgment affirmed.SmithAdams 9/25/2025 10/1/2025 2025-Ohio-4566
State v. Lewis 25CA3, 25CA4, 25CA5knowing, intelligent, and voluntary; Crim.R. 11(C)(2); competent to stand trialHessLawrence 9/25/2025 9/29/2025 2025-Ohio-4520
State v. Miller 24CA12Other crimes, wrongs, or acts evidence; Evid.R. 404(B); harmless error; Re-open case; order of proof; Evid.R. 611(A)HessLawrence 9/22/2025 9/29/2025 2025-Ohio-4519
State v. Crum 23CA4045Aggravated trafficking; Manifest weight; R.C. 2925.03(A)(2); Possession; Constructive possession; Complicity; R.C. 2923.03(A)(2); Testimony of one witnessWilkinScioto 9/18/2025 9/24/2025 2025-Ohio-4443
State v. Booker 24CA4094CRIMINAL-CRIM.R. 32.1-WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA-RES JUDICATA - The judgment of the trial court is affirmed where appellant's Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his guilty pleas alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.SmithScioto 9/17/2025 9/24/2025 2025-Ohio-4455
State v. Ferguson 25CA7Sentencing error; contrary to law; jointly recommended sentence; competency evaluationHessWashington 9/17/2025 9/22/2025 2025-Ohio-4416
State ex rel. Yost v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. 24CA1CIVIL-MOTION TO INTERVENE-CIV.R. 24(A)(2)-INTERVENTION OF RIGHT-CIV.R. 24(B)(2)-PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION - Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying proposed intervenor Little Hocking Water Association's motion to intervene where, although water association had a legally protectable property interest in the underlying subject matter of the action, water association was: (1) unable to demonstrate that its ability to protect its interests would be impaired without intervention in light of fact that water association and defendant had previously engaged in litigation in 2016 which had been resolved by a finding of liability and a confidential settlement agreement and which could be enforced by a separate enforcement action; and (2) water association's arguments that Ohio Attorney General was unable to adequately represent water company's interest relied only upon speculation; because a trial court is presumed to know the applicable law and apply it accordingly and because Civ.R. 24 does not require a trial court to make findings of fact or conclusions of law, simply because trial court did not relate Civ.R. 24(A)(2) factors in its entry did not mean that trial court did not engage in a full analysis of water association's arguments in favor of permissive intervention.SmithWashington 9/17/2025 9/29/2025 2025-Ohio-4521
In re D.B. 23CA708Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, R.C. 2151.23, R.C. 3127.17, R.C. 3127.18(A), home state, subject matter jurisdiction, de novo, habeas corpus, custody, adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law, verified petitionWilkinVinton 9/15/2025 9/23/2025 2025-Ohio-4433
Vickroy v. Vickroy 23CA17Divorce, separate property, marital property, manifest weight of the evidence, tracible property, comingled property, property valuation, life estate, R.C. 3105.171(E)(4), financial misconduct, distributive award, abuse of discretion, civil contempt of courtWilkinHocking 9/12/2025 9/17/2025 2025-Ohio-4364
Ward v. Ross 23CA18Civ.R. 12(B)(6), de novo, Civ.R. 8(A), App.R. 16, Practice of Law, Municipal Court Jurisdiction, Judicial Immunity, 42 U.S.C. 1983, political subdivision immunity, political subdivision employee immunity, R.C. 2701.03, affidavit of disqualification of a judgeWilkinJackson 9/12/2025 9/22/2025 2025-Ohio-4425
State v. Burton 24CA9CRIMINAL-VOLUNTARINESS OF PLEA-DURESS-WAIVER OF COURT COSTS - Appellant failed to demonstrate his guilty plea was involuntary or made under duress despite threats of harm by other jail inmates where he was permitted to consult with counsel prior to entering his plea, and where there was no evidence his will was overborne by the alleged threats; trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion to waive the imposition of court costs.SmithMeigs 9/9/2025 9/18/2025 2025-Ohio-4388
State v. Jones 23CA19CRIMINAL-VOIR DIRE-CRIM.R. 24(C)-CRIM.R. 52(B)-MAXIMUM SENTENCE-R.C. 2921.331(B)-FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH ORDER OR SIGNAL OF POLICE OFFICER - Speculation that outcome of trial would have been different had the trial court or defense attorney advised prospective jurors during voir dire of the name of offense for which defendant was being tried or had the court or defense counsel provided factual context of the underlying charge does not support reversal under plain error doctrine where overwhelming evidence supported defendant's conviction for R.C. 2921.331(B), Failure to Comply with Order or Signal of Police Officer; the same presumption that applies to R.C. 2911 and R.C. 2929.12 should also apply to the sentencing factors under R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(b), that unless the record shows that the court failed to consider the factors or the sentence is strikingly inconsistent with the facts, the court is presumed to have considered the statutory factors if the sentence is within the statutory range; thus Appellant's maximum sentence of 36 months for Failure to Comply with Order or Signal of Police Officer was not disproportionate and contrary to law even though the trial court did not specifically reference the R.C. 2921.331(C)(5)(b) factors at the sentencing hearing or in the sentencing entry.SmithJackson 9/8/2025 9/15/2025 2025-Ohio-4317
State v. Sines-Riley 24CA4097, 24CA4098consecutive sentences; restitution; res judicata; invited errorHessScioto 9/3/2025 9/8/2025 2025-Ohio-3200
State v. Hall 22CA12Criminal law-Aggravated murder-Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion to change venue due to pretrial publicity or by removing African American prospective juror for cause-Trial court did not deprive appellant of due process or a fair trial by allowing victim's motion to wear a "Justice for [K.R.]" shirt during the first day of individual voir dire-Trial court did not violate appellant's privilege against self-incrimination-Trial court did not allow the prosecution to introduce improper victim-impact evidence, and even if it did, any error did not affect the outcome of the trial-Sufficient evidence supported appellant's conviction and conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Trial counsel was not ineffective-Prosecutor did not engage in misconduct that warranted a reversal of appellant's conviction-Conspiracy indictment was defective for failing to allege a substantial overt act-Conspiracy conviction reversed and vacated, and judgment otherwise affirmed.AbeleMeigs 8/29/2025 9/8/2025 2025-Ohio-3199
State v. Johnson 23CA11Criminal law-App.R. 26(B)-Reopened appeal-Appellant did not establish that appellate counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal-Judgment confirmed.AbeleHighland 8/27/2025 9/3/2025 2025-Ohio-3137
State v. Goss 25CA1210Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law when the trial court properly considered R.C. 2929.11 principles of sentencing, and R.C. 2929.12 seriousness and recidivism factors.AbeleAdams 8/27/2025 9/3/2025 2025-Ohio-3136
State v. Glenn 24CA4082Because counsel and the trial court incorrectly informed appellant that she is eligible for judicial release after serving two years of her sentence, appellant did not enter a knowing and intelligent plea.AbeleScioto 8/26/2025 9/2/2025 2025-Ohio-3121
State v. Knauff 23CA29Kidnapping; felonious assault; earned credit; good time credit; R.C. 2967.193; agreed sentence; contrary to law; R.C. 2953.08(A)(4) and (D)(1); a court speaks through its journal entriesWilkinRoss 8/21/2025 8/26/2025 2025-Ohio-3046
Peddler's Junction, L.L.C. v. Washington Square, L.L.C. 24CA7Summary judgment-no genuine issues of material fact remained as to whether appellant could succeed on promissory-estoppel claim when evidence failed to show a clear and unambiguous promiseAbeleWashington 8/21/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3054
State v. Riggens 24CA41R.C. 2953.08(D)(1); jointly recommended sentence; consecutive-sentence findings; R.C. 2941.25; allied offenses of similar importHessRoss 8/19/2025 8/25/2025 2025-Ohio-3028
Cee v. Murphy 23CA28Divorce; abuse of discretion; manifest weight; preponderance of the evidence; “during the marriage” date; equitable division of property; marital property; separate property; real estate; mortgage reduction; vehicle; bank accounts; retirement accounts; credit card; R.C. 3105.171(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F) and (G)WilkinRoss 8/19/2025 8/26/2025 2025-Ohio-3045
Southeastern Equip. Co., Inc. v. D.J. Group, Inc. 24CA11jurisdiction; R.C. 2505.02; Civ.R. 54(B); no just reason for delay; judicial economyHessWashington 8/14/2025 8/18/2025 2025-Ohio-2936
State v. Prince 23CA4014The trial court did not admit other acts evidence; admission of codefendants' backseat cruiser statements did not violate Confrontation Clause; court properly overruled mistrial motion; trial court properly instructed jury regarding constructive possession; trial court did not err when it permitted jury to use a listening aid; and appellant's convictions not against the manifest weight or sufficiency of the evidence.AbeleScioto 8/13/2025 8/21/2025 2025-Ohio-2996
In re A.K. 25CA8abused; neglected; dependent; R.C. 2151.031(C); R.C. 2151.03(A)(2); R.C. 2151.04(C); sufficiency; manifest weightHessHighland 8/13/2025 8/18/2025 2025-Ohio-2935
In re H.C. 25CA4Permanent custody-Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Judgment affirmed.AbeleHighland 8/7/2025 8/22/2025 2025-Ohio-3010
In re L.G. 25CA3Permanent custody–Trial court’s judgment placing child in the agency’s permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence–Judgment affirmedWilkinAthens 8/5/2025 8/13/2025 2025-Ohio-2855
State v. Reed 23CA4041Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Knowing, Voluntary, and Intelligent Plea, Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea, Counsel's Failure to Review Discovery with Client; Crim.R. 32.1; Change of Heart; Nine-Factor Test for Withdrawal of Guilty Plea, Newly Discovered EvidenceWilkinScioto 8/5/2025 8/5/2025 2025-Ohio-2753
State v. Adkins 24CA3Fifth Amendment, Consider exercising the right to silence when determining guilt; Crim.R. 32, Final appealable order; Merger and state election of offense for sentencing; Surviving merger; Bench trial, Structural errorWilkinLawrence 8/5/2025 8/11/2025 2025-Ohio-2833
State v. Taylor 25CA2Res judicata barred appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion and request for a suppression hearing.AbeleLawrence 8/1/2025 8/13/2025 2025-Ohio-2853
State v. Dodridge 22CA19CRIMINAL-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - The trial court did not err in declaring the victim to be a hostile witness under Evid.R. 611(C), nor did it err in interrogating the victim in accordance with Evid.R. 614(B); although the victim's prior written statement that was attached to the police was erroneously admitted into evidence as extrinsic evidence of impeachment, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; plain error did occur as a result of the trial court's failure to provide a limiting instruction, nor was trial counsel ineffective for failing to request a limiting instruction; body cam video that was destroyed was not materially exculpable evidence and the defendant failed to prove that the State acted in bad faith in failing to preserve potentially useful evidence; because the defendant's conviction for disrupting public services was supported by sufficient evidence, the trial court did not err in denying his Crim.R. 29(A) motion for judgment of acquittal; defendant failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial as a result of cumulative error.SmithLawrence 8/1/2025 8/13/2025 2025-Ohio-2856
State v. Andrews 24CA4076Trial court did not err when it denied motion to suppress evidence.AbeleScioto 8/1/2025 8/8/2025 2025-Ohio-2803
State v. Woodfork 23CA22CRIMINAL-RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE-INFERIOR DEGREE OFFENSE-LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE-BATSON CHALLENGE-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Trial court's denial of motion for continuance did not deny the appellant his right to counsel of choice; the appellant was not entitled to inferior degree offense and lesser included offense jury instructions; the trial court committed no error in allowing the State's peremptory challenge where no Batson violation occurred; the appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit.SmithRoss 8/1/2025 8/7/2025 2025-Ohio-2786
State v. Shamblin 24CA26CRIMINAL-POSTCONVICTION RELIEF-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL-RES JUDICATA - The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's petition for postconviction relief without holding a hearing; appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised in his petition was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.SmithPickaway 7/29/2025 8/6/2025 2025-Ohio-2760
Burgh v. Potter 24CA3Civ.R. 12(B)(6); de novo; preliminary agreement; contract; whether a contract exists is question of fact; contract interpretation is matter of lawWilkinWashington 7/29/2025 8/6/2025 2025-Ohio-2765
State v. Farmer 24CA4jury instructions; plain error; verdict form; privilege; ineffective assistance of counsel; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; sentencing error; Reagan Tokes Law; sentencing notificationsHessJackson 7/22/2025 7/25/2025 2025-Ohio-2616
State v. Cheatham 23CA17CRIMINAL-INDICTMENT-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE - While an indictment charging sexual offenses against children need not state with specificity the dates of the alleged abuse as long as the prosecution establishes that the offense occurred during the time frame alleged, and where count alleged that conduct occurred between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014; victim testified that the first sexual contact occurred when she was nine years old; and victim did not become nine years old until May 15, 2014, there was no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to establish that conduct occurred within a reasonable proximity to victim's birthday; decision to call or forego calling witnesses is a tactical decision and deficient performance of trial counsel for purported failure to investigate additional witnesses, where record is silent as to the substance of the suggested testimony and how said testimony would have changed outcome of the proceeding, will not be inferred; where defendant refused a plea offer and proceeded to trial, repeatedly denied all allegations of sexual contact and sexual conduct, and attempted to discredit the victims, requesting jury instructions on the lesser included offense of gross sexual imposition on three counts of rape would have undercut defendant's protestations of innocence, thus, trial counsel was not deficient for failing to request the lesser included instruction.SmithJackson 7/18/2025 7/23/2025 2025-Ohio-2584
Cochran v. Cochran 24CA21marital property; date of termination; duration of marriage; valuation of property; distributive award; financial misconductHessAthens 7/18/2025 7/21/2025 2025-Ohio-2565
State v. Kegg 23CA16Rape, R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); Evid.R. 702; expert witness testimony is beyond knowledge or experience of lay persons, is the result of specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, and is based on reliable scientific, technical, or other specialized information; abuse of discretion; delayed reporting of rape; invited error doctrine; juror bias; ineffective assistance of counsel; deficient performance; prejudice; presumed competent; motion for new trial; Crim.R. 33; R.C. 2953.21WilkinAthens 7/17/2025 7/28/2025 2025-Ohio-2651
State v. Harrison 25CA1indefinite sentence; indeterminate sentence; definite sentence; sentencing error; typographical error; nunc pro tunc; ineffective assistance of trial counsel; res judicataHessHighland 7/17/2025 8/4/2025 2025-Ohio-2733
State v. Lawson 24CA28Reverse and remand for trial court to apply New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. , Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022).AbeleRoss 7/17/2025 7/28/2025 2025-Ohio-2650
State v. Buffington 24CA4085 & 24CA4086Trial court committed plain error when it entered a judgment of conviction when the defendant did not first enter a plea.AbeleScioto 7/17/2025 7/22/2025 2025-Ohio-2575
State v. Carr 23CA4023CRIMINAL-SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE-MANIFEST WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE-POSSESSION-CRIM.R. 29 - When an Appellant sets forth specific grounds in a Crim.R. 29 motion, he or she forfeits all other grounds on appeal; where trial court merges convictions for purposes of sentencing, erroneous verdict on the merged count would be harmless error; sufficient circumstantial evidence of guilt supported Appellant's conviction for Aggravated Trafficking of Drugs, particularly as to challenged element of "possession" where multiple officers testified regarding large quantity of methamphetamine and other criminal tools used in trafficking found in appellant's home; appellant's own statement to Chief Probation Officer was incriminating; appellant's statement in jail phone call was incriminating; and appellant's girlfriend/co-defendant's phone contained incriminating text conversations such that any rational trier of fact would have found possession was proven beyond a reasonable doubt; furthermore, based on the foregoing, jury did not lose its way and create a miscarriage of justice and appellant's conviction for aggravated trafficking of drugs was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.SmithScioto 7/16/2025 7/23/2025 2025-Ohio-2583
State v. Alexander 24CA4065Appeal dismissed; trial court lacks jurisdiction after case is terminated; void judgment; final appealable order; appellate court lacks jurisdiction; R.C. 2505.02(B)WilkinScioto 7/16/2025 7/23/2025 2025-Ohio-2587
State v. Perry 23CA20outrageous government conduct; due process; entrapment; forfeiture; proportionalityHessJackson 7/16/2025 7/21/2025 2025-Ohio-2566
State v. Athens 24CA31summary judgment; Athens City Code 11.03.02(A); R.C. 3736.021; auxiliary container; single-use plastic bags; Home Rule Amendment; general law; statewide and comprehensive legislative enactment; police, sanitary, or similar regulations; prescribe a rule of conduct; direct conflictHessAthens 7/16/2025 7/29/2025 2025-Ohio-2652
Parsons v. Parsons 23CA21Spousal support, duration, amount; Spousal support, disability benefits; R.C. 3105.18(B); R.C. 3015.18(C); Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b); Spousal support, burden of proof; Spousal support, equalization of incomeWilkinGallia 7/9/2025 7/16/2025 2025-Ohio-2511
In re S.B. 24CA5Abused, neglected, or dependent child; legal custody, R.C. 2151.011(B)(21); best interest of the child; R.C. 3109.04; preponderance of the evidence; legal custodian, R.C. 2151.353(A)(3); abuse of discretion; unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionableWilkinAthens 7/8/2025 7/23/2025 2025-Ohio-2586
Wilson v. Canup 24CA2Small claims; verbal contract; meeting of the minds; substantial compliance; de novo review; factual determination-weight of the evidence; clear and convincing evidenceWilkinLawrence 7/2/2025 7/9/2025 2025-Ohio-2443
Patton v. Moore 24CA4 & 24CA5Habeas corpus; verified petition, commitment papers, R.C. Chapter 2725; de novo; dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); summary judgment, Civ.R. 56; due process; R.C. 2969.25(C)WilkinPickaway 7/1/2025 7/9/2025 2025-Ohio-2435
State v. Kmosko 23CA4Menacing; Aggravated Menacing; Lesser Included Offense; Jury Instructions; Prosecutorial Misconduct; Closing Arguments; Crim.R. 31(C); Crim.R. 30 (A)WilkinAthens 7/1/2025 7/9/2025 2025-Ohio-2433
123