Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 66 rows. Rows per page: 
1234567
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Oliver v. Marysville 14-18-01The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment and in dismissing appellant’s complaint. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanUnion 5/21/2018 5/21/2018 2018-Ohio-1986
Knapp v. Defiance Therapeutic Massage & Wellness Ctr. 4-17-20The trial court did not err by affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's decision allowing claimant-appellee's application for unemployment compensation. There is some competent, credible evidence supporting the Commission's determination that claimant-appellee worked in covered employment with appellant.PrestonDefiance 5/14/2018 5/14/2018 2018-Ohio-1890
Cline v. Defiance Therapeutic Massage & Wellness Ctr. 4-17-19The trial court did not err by affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's decision allowing claimant-appellee's request for unemployment compensation. There is some competent, credible evidence supporting the Commission's determination that claimant-appellee worked in covered employment with appellant.PrestonDefiance 5/14/2018 5/14/2018 2018-Ohio-1891
State v. Lewis 8-17-43Counsel was not ineffective for allegedly arguing a sentence lower than the statutorily mandated sentence at the sentencing hearing. Defendant was aware of the correct sentence before she changed her plea. Thus, there was no prejudice.WillamowskiLogan 5/14/2018 5/15/2018 2018-Ohio-1911
State v. Pilkington 8-17-38Trial court did not err in compelling defendant to submit to psychological evaluation for motion to suppress when defendant placed her mental state at the time of police interrogations at issue.WillamowskiLogan 5/14/2018 5/15/2018 2018-Ohio-1912
State v. Teeple 13-17-28The trial court erred by finding the defendant-appellant guilty of "hit-skip" upon his plea of no contest. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in partZimmermanSeneca 5/7/2018 5/7/2018 2018-Ohio-1767
State v. Valdez 12-17-11Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Further, the prosecuting attorney's comments made during closing arguments did not affect the defendant-appellant's substantial rights. Judgment affirmed.ZimmermanPutnam 5/7/2018 5/7/2018 2018-Ohio-1768
State v. Craw 10-17-09The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because probable cause existed to issue a search warrant for defendant-appellant's travel trailer. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because the search warrant describes the items to be seized with sufficient particularity. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because defendant-appellant's pre-Miranda statements are admissible under the public-safety exception to the Miranda rule.PrestonMercer 5/7/2018 5/7/2018 2018-Ohio-1769
Roweton v. Willis 8-17-19The trial court did not err in denying defendants'-appellants' motion for relief of judgment under Civ.R. 60(B).ZimmermanLogan 5/7/2018 5/7/2018 2018-Ohio-1770
State v. Dildine 8-17-40The trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant-appellant to maximum consecutive sentences. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanLogan 5/7/2018 5/7/2018 2018-Ohio-1771
1234567