Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 6 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Womack 2-20-12Defendant-Appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress evidence.ZimmermanAuglaize 1/19/2021 1/19/2021 2021-Ohio-98
State v. Robinson 8-20-16Trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a)'s maximum penalty provision during plea colloquy. Even if there was not compliance here, appellant did not demonstrate any prejudice.ShawLogan 1/19/2021 1/19/2021 2021-Ohio-97
State v. Clinchscales 8-20-15The trial court did not err in its sentencing of the defendant-appellant. Judgment affirmed.ZimmermanLogan 1/19/2021 1/19/2021 2021-Ohio-100
Murphy v. Murphy 13-20-10Because the division of property and qualified domestic relations orders are not void, the trial court erred by vacating the orders entered subsequent to the parties' divorce decree. Because the trial court failed to fully and properly consider defendant-appellant's objection to the magistrate's decision, the matter is remanded for the trial court to consider defendant-appellant's objection.PrestonSeneca 1/19/2021 1/19/2021 2021-Ohio-101
Canter v. Garvin 14-19-30The trial court erred by concluding that the writing evidencing an alleged option contract between plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellants’ predecessor trustee contained the essential terms of the alleged contract. In addition, the trial court erred by concluding that the doctrine of part performance applies to remove the alleged option contract from the operation of the statute of frauds. Accordingly, the trial court should have sustained defendants-appellants’ objections to the magistrate’s decision and determined that the alleged option contract is unenforceable.PrestonUnion 1/19/2021 1/19/2021 2021-Ohio-99
State v. Jewell 2-20-11The trial court’s findings are clearly and convincingly supported by the record, and thus the defendant-appellant's sentence is not contrary to law.ZimmermanAuglaize 1/11/2021 1/11/2021 2021-Ohio-32