Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 235 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Davis 2026-CA-1Appellant fails to establish any grounds to disregard the presumption that she was competent to enter a guilty plea, and thus her plea to one count of aggravated possession of drugs was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Judgment affirmed.HuffmanChampaign 8/21/2026 8/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3260
State v. Alexander 2025-CA-95Nothing in the record supports appellant’s contention that the State breached its promise under the parties’ plea agreement to recommend that the trial court impose community control sanctions and not revoke post-release control for appellant’s domestic violence conviction. The State detailed its recommendations at appellant’s plea hearing, and at appellant’s sentencing hearing, the State reaffirmed its adherence to the terms of the plea agreement. Judgment affirmed.TuckerClark 8/21/2026 8/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3254
State v. Scott 2025-CA-83The record does not support appellant’s claim that ineffective assistance of counsel invalidated his negotiated guilty plea in three cases. Judgments affirmed.TuckerClark 8/21/2026 8/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3267
State v. Hayes 2025-CA-50The record does not reflect a violation of appellant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial. Appellant’s felonious assault conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error by failing to merge the offenses of failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer and obstructing official business as allied offenses of similar import. The trial court’s consecutive-sentence findings are not contrary to law or clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgment affirmed.TuckerGreene 8/21/2026 8/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3263
State v. Nelson 2025-CA-54Appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived her Miranda rights. The interrogating officers did not engage in any deceptive or coercive conduct that rendered appellant’s statements involuntary. Judgment affirmed.TuckerGreene 8/21/2026 8/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3266
12345678910...>>