Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 258 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Fussnecker v. Lamb CA2017-04-003Municipal court did not err in finding that property owner's claims regarding two prior property-related payments he made as a tenant were merged into the deed when he purchased the property.M. PowellBrown 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8635
Adkins v. Adkins CA2016-12-227Trial court did not err by awarding Mother the marital residence and determining the fair market value of the property. Although Father claims he would pay a higher price than the amount assessed by the trial court, there is nothing to suggest that Father's estimate is more representative of the fair market value of the property than that of Mother and the county auditor.RinglandButler 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8636
State v. Dillingham CA2017-08-111The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for a new trial where it was untimely by over six years and otherwise barred by the doctrine of res judicata.S. PowellButler 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8637
State v. Workman CA2016-12-082, CA2016-12-083The majority of appellant's rape convictions are supported by the manifest weight of the evidence, however, there is a deficiency in the record as to one of appellant's convictions and that conviction must be vacated. The remaining convictions are affirmed. RinglandClermont 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8638
In re Adoption of R.M.T. CA2016-12-107, CA2017-05-056, CA2017-05-057Adoption, appointed counsel, failure to file transcript, civil litigants, incarcerated parent.RinglandWarren 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 2017-Ohio-8639
State v. Pichardo-Reyes CA2016-09-184Appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight where the jury heard evidence that appellant hit, punched, bit, and strangled the victim, who is the mother of his children.PiperButler 11/13/2017 11/13/2017 2017-Ohio-8534
State v. Davis CA2017-04-049The municipal court had subject-matter jurisdiction over appellant's domestic violence charge and appellant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence where the state demonstrated appellant knowingly caused physical harm to his teenage daughter by punching her in the face with a closed fist.HendricksonButler 11/13/2017 11/13/2017 2017-Ohio-8535
State v. Abrams CA2017-03-018, CA2017-03-019Appellant's 44-month prison sentence for three misdemeanor theft offenses and four, fifth-degree felony theft-related offenses was supported by the record and was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the court considered the principles and purposes of sentencing in accordance with R.C. 2929.11, considered the seriousness and recidivism factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, and made the necessary consecutive sentencing findings in accordance with R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Further, the trial court did not err in ordering appellant to pay his victims restitution as the record reflects the court considered appellant's present and future ability to pay the financial sanction.HendricksonClermont 11/13/2017 11/13/2017 2017-Ohio-8536
State v. Leiter CA2016-12-104Appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the arresting officer testified that appellant drove while showing signs of intoxication such as bloodshot and glassy eyes and slurred speech, and the officer found drugs and a speed limit sign in appellant's truck.PiperWarren 11/13/2017 11/13/2017 2017-Ohio-8537
State v. Clayton CA2017-01-009On remand from appellate court's reversal of the trial court's grant of motion to suppress, trial court did not err in convicting appellant of marijuana possession without first reopening the motion to suppress. Trial court's admission of non-testifying co-defendant's statements to police into evidence at joint bench trial did not violate appellant's right of confrontation.M. PowellWarren 11/13/2017 11/13/2017 2017-Ohio-8538