Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 155 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Elrod 2018-P-0038APPELLATE REVIEW - App.R. 4(A); thirty-day rule; Civ.R. 58(B); untimely appeal.GrendellPortage 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2824
State v. Pino 2017-L-171CRIMINAL LAW - pursuant to R.C. 2929.15(B)(1)(c)(i), if a defendant who is under community control sanctions for committing a fifth degree felony commits a technical violation of his community control sanctions or a new crime which is not a felony, the trial court can only impose a sentence not exceeding 90 days; a technical violation of community control sanctions is one which violates the terms of the sanctions, but which is not itself criminal.O'TooleLake 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2825
State v. Snyder 2017-A-0041; 2017-A-0042; 2017-A-0043CRIMINAL - consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings; contrary to law; jury waiver; no contest plea; error in plea agreement; Crim.R. 11; substantial compliance; harmless errorGrendellAshtabula 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2826
State v. Weir 2017-A-0039CRIMINAL LAW - PLEAS - guilty plea; Crim.R. 11(C)(2); waiver of constitutional rights; strict compliance; colloquy; reasonably intelligible to the defendant; defendant read plea agreement into the record; knowingly and voluntarily; stipulated sentence; not reviewable on appeal; R.C. 2953.08(D)(1); no duty to advise.CannonAshtabula 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2827
State v. Weaver 2017-A-0038CRIMINAL LAW - motion to suppress; execution of arrest warrant; failure to appear; Sudafed; reports that residence was used to make methamphetamine; noxious odors; frequent foot traffic; officers observed activities through window consistent with meth manufacture; one-pot method; volatile; probable cause; exigent circumstances; justified in entering residence.RiceAshtabula 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 2018-Ohio-2675
Cragon v. Shinkle 2017-A-0072EVIDENCE - Hearsay exception for public records or reports; Evid.R. 803(8); R.C. 2317.42; admission of real estate tax bill for property; produced by county treasurer; sufficient to establish delinquent property taxes.WrightLake 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 2018-Ohio-2676
State v. Sankey 2017-A-0080POSTCONVICTION RELIEF - abuse of discretion; alleged disparate sentence; res judicata; evidentiary hearing not required where evidence does not demonstrate substantive grounds for relief. State v. SankeyAshtabula 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 2018-Ohio-2677
State v. Corpening 2018-A-0041APPELLATE REVIEW - App.R. 5(A); delayed appeal; motion fails to set forth reasons for delay.CannonAshtabula 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 2018-Ohio-2678
State v. Petromilli 2016-L-071CRIMINAL LAW - kidnapping; felonious assault; merger; sufficiency of the evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; conviction supported by sufficient, credible evidence; additional arguments; pro se; no ineffective assistance of counsel. RiceLake 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2574
Unifund CCR Partners v. Piaser 2017-A-0003CIV.R. 23 - class action; debt collector; fair debt collection practices act; plaintiff allegedly violated act that prohibited debt collector from using any false or misleading representation in collection of debt by alleging in its complaint that it was the owner of the account without obtaining assignment from third party; class definition was overbroad because it included consumers who have no claim; class definition, as amended by trial court, defines improper fail safe class because it requires court to rule on merits of claim at class certification stage in order to tell who is included in class; case was remanded for court to modify class definition to eliminate fail safe language; case remanded because, without plaintiff's compliance with court-ordered discovery, trial court was unable to determine at the certification stage whether "marking" process resulted in transfer of ownership to third party, thus requiring assignment to plaintiff.RiceAshtabula 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2575