|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Gibson
| 17AP-200 | The trial court erred in finding that criminal defendant recently transferred into custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction had not alleged that issue of miscalculation of jail-time credit had not been raised at sentencing when such language appeared on the face of his pro se motion. It was also error to deny his motion by thus denying the trial court's continuing jurisdiction to correct jail-time credit errors pursuant to R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(g)(iii). | Brunner | Franklin |
8/17/2017
|
8/17/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7254 |
|
BNA Constr. Ltd. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
| 16AP-317 | The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion in affirming a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission which found that workers performing services for appellant were employees and not independent contractors. Judgment affirmed. | Dorrian | Franklin |
8/15/2017
|
8/15/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7227 |
|
State v. Hayes
| 16AP-531 | Convictions for murder and felonious assault were not against the manifest weight of the evidence when surveillance video and testimony of surviving victim supported the jury's determination that the appellant was the shooter. | Tyack | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7185 |
|
State v. Adams
| 16AP-755 | Trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress evidence uncovered in the warrantless search of his vehicle. Under the collective knowledge doctrine, a uniformed officer who received a radio call from an undercover officer informing him that appellant had committed an illegal U-turn was competent to testify about the factual basis for the subsequent traffic stop even though he did not witness the violation. Because a reasonable suspicion that appellant had just completed an illegal drug transaction arose during a lawful traffic stop, appellant's extended detention in order for a K-9 unit to conduct a sweep of appellant's vehicle did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Judgment affirmed. | Sadler | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7186 |
|
State v. Brodbeck
| 17AP-61 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file an untimely motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence pursuant to Crim R. 33. | Dorrian | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7187 |
|
In re E.R.
| 17AP-82 & 17AP-84 | Judgments affirmed. Competent, credible evidence supported the trial court's determination that granting the motion for permanent custody of the children services agency and divesting appellant of her parental rights was in the best interests of the minor children. | Horton | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7188 |
|
Trent v. Taylor
| 17AP-89 | Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying supervised parenting time until parties engaged in reunification counseling and followed recommendation of the counselor. | Tyack | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7189 |
|
Ream v. Graffiti Foods, Ltd.
| 17AP-179 | Steven Ream appeals the dismissal, pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) of a defamation suit against Graffiti Foods, Ltd, and Philip Griesinger. Ream was fired by Griesinger who sent an email to persons in the food industry that could be characterized as defamatory. The complaint claimed statements in the email were false and that Ream was fired for asking for a raise. Judgment reversed and remanded. | Tyack | Franklin |
8/10/2017
|
8/10/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7190 |
|
State ex rel. Pleasant v. Indus. Comm.
| 15AP-637 | Magistrate's decision adopted. The Industrial Commission of Ohio did not abuse its discretion by exercising continuing jurisdiction over claims for temporary total disability compensation and permanent total disability compensation for mistakes of fact and fraud, where the evidence showed the claimant was capable of, and was performing, sustained remunerative employment. The commission's orders identified and explained its findings, in accordance with the governing law. | Brunner | Franklin |
8/8/2017
|
8/8/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7130 |
|
Six v. Gahanna Trailer Servs.
| 16AP-91 | On summary judgment Appellant did not set forth specific facts demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact to support his claims. The trial court did not err in granting appellees' motions for summary judgment or in failing to admit into evidence appellant's motion for leave to file the originally scanned affidavit because appellant could not demonstrate prejudice. | Brunner | Franklin |
8/8/2017
|
8/8/2017
| 2017-Ohio-7131 |
|