|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
In re: P.A.
| 17AP-728 | The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant was a mentally ill person subject to court order and, thus, subject to involuntary commitment to a mental hospital. The trial court did not err in permitting the forced medication of appellant with psychotropic medication. | Klatt | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2314 |
|
McDougald v. ODRC
| 17AP-776 | Court of Claims did not err in granting appellee's motion to dismiss appellant's complaint. | Brown, P.J. | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2315 |
|
State v. Dilo
| 16AP-324 | Judgment affirmed. Because the evidence presented by the state against defendant-appellant was not legally insufficient to convict him of aggravated possession of drugs under R.C. 2925.11 and aggravated trafficking in drugs under R.C. 2925.03, his convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the three assignments of error are overruled. | Horton | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2316 |
|
Bahgat v. Kissling
| 17AP-641 | Appellant's contention that the trial court erred in denying an extension of time to file a hearing transcript to support his factual objections to a magistrate's decision lacked merit, and, concomitantly, the trial court did not err in sanctioning appellant under R.C. 2323.51. Appellant likewise did not demonstrate the trial court erred in regard to adjudicating his Consumer Sales Practices Act claim. Judgment affirmed. | Sadler | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2317 |
|
State v. Jackson
| 17AP-863 | The judgment of the trial court dismissing defendant-appellant’s motion for a new mitigation trial under Crim.R. 33 is affirmed, as the Supreme Court of Ohio’s opinion in State v. Mason, ___Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-1462, precludes his challenge to the constitutionality of Ohio’s death penalty statute, R.C. 2929.03-04, under the holding of Hurst v. Florida, ___U.S.___, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). | Horton | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2318 |
|
State ex rel. Boddie, Jr. v. Baldwin
| 17AP-817 | Petition dismissed. The magistrate recommends dismissing the petition because petitioner failed to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C). No objections to the magistrate’s decision have been filed. The decision is adopted. | Horton | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2319 |
|
DiCuccio v. Lindsmith
| 17AP-77 | Judgment affirmed. Based on the evidence presented at the sanctions hearing, the trial court found that appellant clearly abused the judicial process and thwarted the administration of justice. Our review shows that the record contains competent, credible evidence to support the trial court's findings and judgment entry, including the allocation of attorney fees and expenses. | Horton | Franklin |
6/14/2018
|
6/14/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2320 |
|
Peterson v. Indus. Comm.
| 17AP-230 | Objections to magistrate's decision overruled in workers compensation original action brought by injured worker. No abuse of discretion by Industrial Commission of Ohio in denying ongoing psychological counseling recommended by psychologist professional who was not a psychiatrist. Issue of the psychologist’s qualifications was waived for purposes of mandamus action when not first administratively addressed at the commission. Magistrate's decision adopted and writ of mandamus denied. | Brunner | Franklin |
6/12/2018
|
6/12/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2270 |
|
State v. Smith
| 17AP-636 | Appellant's plea of guilty was not the result of improper inducements offered by the prosecution and was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Appellant received effective assistance of trial counsel at the plea hearing and sentencing. Judgment affirmed. | Sadler | Franklin |
6/12/2018
|
6/12/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2271 |
|
Gordon v. State Dept. Rehab. & Corr.
| 17AP-792 | Prisoner Gordon sues the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. The Court of Claims of Ohio's decision to deny Gordon's second amended complaint for failure to comply with Civ.R. 15(A) is affirmed for not being timely filed or seeking leave of the court. Gordon's first amended complaint was properly dismissed for a lack of subject matter jurisdication and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Judgment affirmed. | Tyack | Franklin |
6/12/2018
|
6/12/2018
| 2018-Ohio-2272 |
|