Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 180 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re: P.A. 17AP-728The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant was a mentally ill person subject to court order and, thus, subject to involuntary commitment to a mental hospital. The trial court did not err in permitting the forced medication of appellant with psychotropic medication.KlattFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2314
McDougald v. ODRC 17AP-776Court of Claims did not err in granting appellee's motion to dismiss appellant's complaint.Brown, P.J.Franklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2315
State v. Dilo 16AP-324Judgment affirmed. Because the evidence presented by the state against defendant-appellant was not legally insufficient to convict him of aggravated possession of drugs under R.C. 2925.11 and aggravated trafficking in drugs under R.C. 2925.03, his convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the three assignments of error are overruled.HortonFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2316
Bahgat v. Kissling 17AP-641Appellant's contention that the trial court erred in denying an extension of time to file a hearing transcript to support his factual objections to a magistrate's decision lacked merit, and, concomitantly, the trial court did not err in sanctioning appellant under R.C. 2323.51. Appellant likewise did not demonstrate the trial court erred in regard to adjudicating his Consumer Sales Practices Act claim. Judgment affirmed.SadlerFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2317
State v. Jackson 17AP-863The judgment of the trial court dismissing defendant-appellant’s motion for a new mitigation trial under Crim.R. 33 is affirmed, as the Supreme Court of Ohio’s opinion in State v. Mason, ___Ohio St.3d ___, 2018-Ohio-1462, precludes his challenge to the constitutionality of Ohio’s death penalty statute, R.C. 2929.03-04, under the holding of Hurst v. Florida, ___U.S.___, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016).HortonFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2318
State ex rel. Boddie, Jr. v. Baldwin 17AP-817Petition dismissed. The magistrate recommends dismissing the petition because petitioner failed to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C). No objections to the magistrate’s decision have been filed. The decision is adopted.HortonFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2319
DiCuccio v. Lindsmith 17AP-77Judgment affirmed. Based on the evidence presented at the sanctions hearing, the trial court found that appellant clearly abused the judicial process and thwarted the administration of justice. Our review shows that the record contains competent, credible evidence to support the trial court's findings and judgment entry, including the allocation of attorney fees and expenses.HortonFranklin 6/14/2018 6/14/2018 2018-Ohio-2320
Peterson v. Indus. Comm. 17AP-230Objections to magistrate's decision overruled in workers compensation original action brought by injured worker. No abuse of discretion by Industrial Commission of Ohio in denying ongoing psychological counseling recommended by psychologist professional who was not a psychiatrist. Issue of the psychologist’s qualifications was waived for purposes of mandamus action when not first administratively addressed at the commission. Magistrate's decision adopted and writ of mandamus denied.BrunnerFranklin 6/12/2018 6/12/2018 2018-Ohio-2270
State v. Smith 17AP-636Appellant's plea of guilty was not the result of improper inducements offered by the prosecution and was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Appellant received effective assistance of trial counsel at the plea hearing and sentencing. Judgment affirmed.SadlerFranklin 6/12/2018 6/12/2018 2018-Ohio-2271
Gordon v. State Dept. Rehab. & Corr. 17AP-792Prisoner Gordon sues the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. The Court of Claims of Ohio's decision to deny Gordon's second amended complaint for failure to comply with Civ.R. 15(A) is affirmed for not being timely filed or seeking leave of the court. Gordon's first amended complaint was properly dismissed for a lack of subject matter jurisdication and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Judgment affirmed.TyackFranklin 6/12/2018 6/12/2018 2018-Ohio-2272