Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 68 rows. Rows per page: 
1234567
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Tarrier v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd. 18AP-12Objection of respondent sustained and writ of mandamus denied. Relator has not shown that she has a clear legal right to the relief she requests, nor that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the act requested. Therefore, relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, Public Employees Retirement Board, to retroactively modify relator's retirement plan with the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System from the Combined Plan to the Traditional Pension Plan, effective to October 8, 1987, her original date of hire by the Franklin County Public Defender.Beatty BluntFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-681
State ex rel. Merritt v. Indus. Comm. 18AP-234Mandamus denied. There is some evidence on which the commission could rely to conclude that relator was terminated from his employment for testing positive for marijuana. Therefore, the commission did not abuse its discretion.KlattFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-682
MDC Coast I., L.L.C. v. Union Cty. Bd. of Revision 18AP-721The Board of Tax Appeals erred in failing to consider all the non-sale-price evidence, including the entirety of the appraisal, that the property owner offered to prove the true value of the subject property for tax purposes.KlattFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-683
Brown v. Corr. Reception Ctr. 19AP-104Construing the evidence most favorably to the non-moving plaintiff and conducting a de novo review, genuine issues of fact as to each of the disputed elements of retaliation claim exist, making it not suitable for resolution on summary judgment according to evidence in record.BrunnerFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-684
State v. Clemonts 19AP-406, 19AP-407, 19AP-408, & 19AP-409The trial court did not err in resentencing Clemonts pursuant to the remand order, and the duration of Clemonts' sentences and the imposition of consecutive sentences are in accordance with law. However, the trial court made a clerical error in the judgment entries in Case Nos. 18CR-238 and 18CR-434.Luper SchusterFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-685
Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Davis 19AP-474In an action to collect on an R.C. 5747.13 tax assessment judgment, the trial court erred in denying the judgment creditor's Civ.R. 69 motion to compel discovery. Judgment reversed, cause remanded.SadlerFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-686
State ex rel. Gerald v. Court of Claims 19AP-778The magistrate properly determined that this matter should be sua sponte dismissed because relator failed to comply with the requirements of R.C. 2969.25(C). Thus, the magistrate's decision is adopted, and this action is sua sponte dismissed.Luper SchusterFranklin 2/27/2020 2/27/2020 2020-Ohio-687
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Capital Roofing, L.L.C. 18AP-689, 18AP-691, 18AP-692Where genuine issues of material fact existed in the summary judgment record as to elements of the plaintiff's claims for vicarious liability, the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff on that claim is reversed. Where the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the jury's verdict in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff was not entitled to a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict.BrunnerFranklin 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2020-Ohio-642
State v. L.A.A. 19AP-218Trial court did not err in dismissing appellant's petition for postconviction relief for lack of jurisdiction because petition was untimely filed and appellant failed to meet the requirements under R.C. 2953.23(A) for untimely filing.DorrianFranklin 2/25/2020 2/25/2020 2020-Ohio-643
Jezerinac v. Dioun 18AP-479Motion for reconsideration granted; original majority decision contained obvious errors. Trial court did not abuse its discretion by staying discovery to decide issues of law; trial court did not abuse its discretion by enforcing default and termination provisions in a commercial lease; trial court did not abuse its discretion when it rejected one purchase offer and approved another purchase offer for a business in receivership.KlattFranklin 2/20/2020 2/20/2020 2020-Ohio-587
1234567