Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 739 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion) 2015-1127Privilege-Work-product doctrine-Order compelling production of materials alleged to be protected by the attorney-client privilege is a final, appealable order-Smith v. Chen, limited.Lanzinger, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8000 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8000
In re Grand Jury Proceedings of John Doe (Slip Opinion) 2015-1181 and 2015-1182Final, appealable order-Grand jury subpoena ordering production of documents-Privilege-Order denying motion to quash grand jury subpoena and ordering party to testify or produce documents was final and appealable-Judgment reversed and cause remanded.Lanzinger, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8001 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8001
James v. State (Slip Opinion) 2015-1230R.C. 2743.48-Former prison inmate failed to meet statutory definition of "wrongfully imprisoned individual"-Trial court's grant of summary judgment to the state reinstated.Pfeifer, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8012 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8012
Ratonel v. Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A. (Slip Opinion) 2015-0724Legal-malpractice claim-Attorney-client relationship-Attorney refused to undertake representation of clients on the matter at issue-Trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of attorney and law firm reinstated.Pfeifer, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8013 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8013
Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino (Slip Opinion) 2016-0858Judges-Judicial campaigns-Misconduct-Violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct-One-year suspension with final six months stayed on conditions.Lanzinger, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8014 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8014
State ex rel. Cleveland v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion) 2015-1204Oral argument canceled, court of appeals' judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8015 12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8015
12/07/2016 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Motion and procedural rulings-Miscellaneous dismissals.   12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8021
12/07/2016 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   12/7/2016 12/7/2016 2016-Ohio-8034
State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion) 2015-0390Mandamus-Public Records Act-R.C. 149.43-Writ of mandamus sought to compel Ohio Department of Public Safety to disclose recordings from cameras mounted on the dashboards of State Highway Patrol cruisers-Investigative work-product exception-Claim capable or repetition yet evading review-Case-by-case review required to determine whether dash-cam recordings must be disclose-Request for attorney fees, statutory damages, and costs denied.French, J.Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-7987 12/6/2016 12/6/2016 2016-Ohio-7987
State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion) 2015-1243Workers' compensation-Working-wage loss-Industrial Commission did not abuse discretion in awarding compensation for working-wage loss attributed to claimant's lack of overtime earnings while working in light-duty position-Record contained evidence that claimant was placed in light-duty program because of medical restrictions causally related to allowed conditions of claim and that claimant's appeal from initial denial of application for wage-loss compensation had been timely filed-Court of appeals' judgment denying writ of mandamus affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-7988 12/6/2016 12/6/2016 2016-Ohio-7988