Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 320 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
06/29/2015 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings-Miscellaneous dismissals.   6/29/2015 6/29/2015 2015-Ohio-2567
06/26/2015 Administrative Actions  Administrative actions.   6/26/2015 6/26/2015 2015-Ohio-2568
State v. Keenan (Slip Opinion) 2013-1731Criminal law-Sanctions for discovery violations-Retrial after issuance of writ of habeas corpus due to suppression of discovery material in violation of Brady v. Maryland-Trial court abused discretion by dismissing case with prejudice without giving parties opportunity to develop the record.Pfeifer, J.Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2484 6/25/2015 6/25/2015 2015-Ohio-2484
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Scaccia (Slip Opinion) 2014-2143Attorneys at law-Misconduct-Trust-account violations-Neglect of an entrusted legal matter-Failure to communicate effectively with a client about the nature and scope of representation-One-year suspension partially stayed on conditions, to run concurrently with sanction imposed in Dayton Bar Assn. v. Scaccia, 141 Ohio St.3d 35, 2014-Ohio-4278, 21 N.E.3d 290.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2487 6/25/2015 6/25/2015 2015-Ohio-2487
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Moore (Slip Opinion) 2014-1737Attorneys-Misconduct-Engaging in illegal conduct-Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation-Knowingly making a false statement in connection with a disciplinary matter-Two-year suspension with second year stayed on conditions.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2488 6/25/2015 6/25/2015 2015-Ohio-2488
Disciplinary Counsel v. Coleman (Slip Opinion) 2014-2148Attorney misconduct-Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including failing to hold the property of client separate from the lawyer's property and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation-Two-year suspension, with 18 months stayed on conditions.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2489 6/25/2015 6/25/2015 2015-Ohio-2489
06/25/2015 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Motion and procedural rulings-Miscellaneous dismissals.   6/25/2015 6/25/2015 2015-Ohio-2508
06/24/2015 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Merit decisions without opinions-Motion and procedural rulings-Appeals accepted for review-Appeals not accepted for review-Reconsideration of prior decisions.   6/24/2015 6/24/2015 2015-Ohio-2341
State ex rel. Tradesmen Internatl. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion) 2014-0678Mandamus-Workers' compensation-Permanent total disability-Start date for compensation-Industrial Commission did not abuse discretion in using date of doctor's report as start date when doctor did not list allowed conditions-Report that claimant could perform sedentary work can be some evidence of permanent total disability when other findings in report effectively preclude any sustained remunerative employment.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2342 6/24/2015 6/24/2015 2015-Ohio-2342
State v. Rogers (Slip Opinion) 2013-1255An accused's failure to raise issue of allied offenses of similar import in the trial court forfeits all but plain error-A forfeited error is not reversible error unless it affected the outcome of the proceeding and reversal is necessary to correct a manifest miscarriage of justice-Unless an accused shows a reasonable probability that his convictions are for allied offenses of similar import committed with the same conduct and without a separate animus, he cannot demonstrate that the trial court's failure to inquire whether the convictions merge for purposes of sentencing was plain error.O'Donnell, J.Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-2459 6/24/2015 6/24/2015 2015-Ohio-2459