Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 63 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Jordan 19CA1105NO-CONTACT ORDER - Because the trial court imposed a no-contact order in addition to a prison term for the same offense, the no-contact order must be vacated consistent with the holding of State v. Anderson, 143 Ohio St.3d 1173, 2015-Ohio-2089, 35 N.E.3d 512.SmithAdams 7/28/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3928
State v. Barnes 19CA3687MAJOR DRUG OFFENDER DETERMINATION - The trial court did not err by failing to explicitly state in the sentencing entry that Appellant had been determined to be a major drug offender.SmithRoss 7/28/2020 8/4/2020 2020-Ohio-3943
State v. Trout 19CA3866CHILD WITNESS COMPETENCY-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE - In light of prosecutor's questions of child witness in direct examination as to the consequences for untruthfulness, trial court did not commit plain error by ruling child victim was competent to testify although he did not specifically question her as to the consequences for untruthfulness or test her understanding of the oath, and defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to submit proposed questions to the trial court for use during child witness competency hearing where pursuant to R.C. 2317.01, trial court was not required to use proposed questions and Appellant's claim of deficient performance was only speculation. SmithScioto 7/23/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3940
State v. Funderburke 19CA3689Appellant’s conviction for receiving stolen property was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.AbeleRoss 7/17/2020 7/27/2020 2020-Ohio-3847
Stepp v. Starrett 19CA718Jurisdiction; Civ.R. 54(B); summary judgment; de novo review; Civ.R. 56(C); R.C. 1782.42; R.C. 1782.17; R.C. 1782.11HessVinton 7/14/2020 7/23/2020 2020-Ohio-3814
In re M.C.L. 19CA1099delinquent child; sexual imposition; R.C. 2907.06(A)(1); R.C. 2907.06(B); manifest weight of the evidenceHessAdams 7/2/2020 7/10/2020 2020-Ohio-3683
Stamper v. Polley 19CA1088Land installment contract–insurance proceeds vendors received after fire destroys property are for the benefit of the legal and equitable estates and not for vendors’ sole benefit; vendor entitled to insurance proceeds to the extent of the unpaid balance remaining on the contract and any excess is for vendees’ benefit.AbeleAdams 7/2/2020 7/15/2020 2020-Ohio-3709
State v. Greene 19CA8rape; R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); motion to suppress; custodial interrogation; non-custodial interrogation; Miranda rights; coercive police tactics; waiver; Crim.R. 12; Crim.R. 47HessHighland 7/1/2020 7/10/2020 2020-Ohio-3684
In re Z.C. 19CA3693Trial court properly denied motion to modify child support.AbeleRoss 6/26/2020 7/7/2020 2020-Ohio-3635
Clough v. Watkins 19CA20Evid.R. 803(6)–trial court did not abuse its discretion by preventing plaintiff in personal injury action from introducing medical expert’s report when medical expert did not testify at trial; trial court did not err by entering a directed verdict in appellee’s favor due to lack of evidence regarding causation; appellant did not present medical testimony to link his neck injury to accident; court will not disregard evidence rule in order to make it easier for a party to prove negligence claim.AbeleWashington 6/19/2020 6/24/2020 2020-Ohio-3446