Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 116 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Duncan 1-19-75Opinion testimony from a lay witness must be admitted in accordance with Evid.R. 701. Evidence of other acts must be admitted in accordance with Evid.R. 404(B).WillamowskiAllen 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3916
State v. Jones 13-19-11Defendant-appellant’s guilty pleas were not unknowing, unintelligent, or involuntary. The trial court did not err by not merging defendant-appellant's rape and importuning convictions.ZimmermanCrawford 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3919
In re K.J. 5-19-31, 5-19-32Trial court erred in adjudicating the children to be dependent and neglected when there was no evidence presented that the environment or condition of the children was such to warrant the state to assume guardianship because there was no effect on the children. The state also failed to show that the children lacked parental care when the evidence showed the children were healthy, happy, clothed, fed, and in a safe home.WillamowskiHancock 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3918
State v. Shepherd 6-19-02, 6-19-03Defendant-appellant's tampering-with-evidence conviction is based on sufficient evidence and is not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant-appellant's confrontation rights were not violated. Defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective.ZimmermanHardin 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3915
State v. Parsons 7-20-01Trial court did not err in dismissing the petition for postconviction relief without a hearing when the error involved an alleged misapplication of law and the case cited as the basis of the error was clearly distinguishable.WillamowskiHenry 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3917
State v. Harrison 8-19-48The trial court erred in finding that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply in this case. Shaw Logan 8/3/2020 8/3/2020 2020-Ohio-3920
State v. Simon 5-19-47The trial court's findings are supported by competent, credible evidence, and therefore, the trial court did not err in designating the defendant-appellant as a sexual predator under Megan's Law.ZimmermanHancock 7/27/2020 7/27/2020 2020-Ohio-3841
Siferd v. Siferd 5-19-42The trial court did not abuse its discretion by adopting the magistrate's recommendation regarding the spousal support award.PrestonHancock 7/27/2020 7/27/2020 2020-Ohio-3846
State v. Kammeyer 13-19-48The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a video recording of the controlled purchase operation because sufficient evidence was presented to authenticate the recording. Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because the trial court failed to make all of the required R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the sentencing hearing, defendant-appellant's sentences are contrary to law.PrestonSeneca 7/27/2020 7/27/2020 2020-Ohio-3842
In re L.G. 13-19-52, 53Trial court did not err by dismissing mother's motion to modify visitation where mother did not demonstrate compliance with discovery or with prior court orders.ShawSeneca 7/27/2020 7/27/2020 2020-Ohio-3844