Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 73 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Benvenuto 1-17-39The trial court did not err in overruling Defendant-Appellant's motino to suppress. Additionally, Defendant-Appellant's RICO conviction, through his plea of no contest, is supported by sufficient evidence in the record. Further, the trial court did not err in failing to merge three charges into a single offense. Lastly, the trial court did not err in its sentence of the Defendant-Appellant. Judgment affirmed. ZimmermanAllen 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2242
State v. Lundy 1-18-11The trial court abused its discretion by denying the defendant-appellant's motion to waive, suspend, or modify payment of costs. PrestonAllen 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2243
State v. Close 8-17-45Forfeiture specifications need not be addressed in the sentencing entry as they are not part of the punishment. The sentence was supported by the evidence. WillamowskiLogan 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2244
State v. Stewart 8-17-47Convictions for Corrupting Another with Drugs supported by sufficient evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to demonstrate ineffective assistance of trial counsel.ShawLogan 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2245
State v. Kimpel 17-17-12A trial court may allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea after he or she has been sentenced if the defendant demonstrates a manifest injustice. WillamowskiShelby 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2246
State v. Westerfield 3-17-15; 3-17-16Appeal dismissed where defendant acquitted of all crimes, second appeal denied where appellant did not demonstrate ineffective assitance of counsel.ShawCrawford 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 2018-Ohio-2139
State v. Buell 3-17-14The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentences are unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.PrestonCrawford 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 2018-Ohio-2140
Oliver v. Marysville 14-18-01The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and summary judgment and in dismissing appellant’s complaint. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanUnion 5/21/2018 5/21/2018 2018-Ohio-1986
Knapp v. Defiance Therapeutic Massage & Wellness Ctr. 4-17-20The trial court did not err by affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's decision allowing claimant-appellee's application for unemployment compensation. There is some competent, credible evidence supporting the Commission's determination that claimant-appellee worked in covered employment with appellant.PrestonDefiance 5/14/2018 5/14/2018 2018-Ohio-1890
Cline v. Defiance Therapeutic Massage & Wellness Ctr. 4-17-19The trial court did not err by affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's decision allowing claimant-appellee's request for unemployment compensation. There is some competent, credible evidence supporting the Commission's determination that claimant-appellee worked in covered employment with appellant.PrestonDefiance 5/14/2018 5/14/2018 2018-Ohio-1891
12345678