Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 29 rows. Rows per page: 
123
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re M.G. 1-18-54An appellate court will not reverse an award of legal custody absent a showing that the trial court abused its discretion.WillamowskiAllen 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 2019-Ohio-906
State v. Jessen 2-18-16The trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanAuglaize 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 2019-Ohio-907
State v. Woodward 5-18-21Trial court's determination that defendant's confession was voluntary affirmed.ShawHancock 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 2019-Ohio-908
Severns v. Foster 9-18-21The trial court did not abuse its discretion by designating plaintiff-appellee as the residential parent and legal custodian of the plaintiff-appellee and defendant-appellant's minor child.PrestonMarion 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 2019-Ohio-909
Huffman v. Eachus 13-18-32The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff-appellant’s motion for a modification of an existing custody decree in which plaintiff-appellant requested that he be designated as the residential parent of his minor son.PrestonSeneca 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 2019-Ohio-910
Moyer v. Brown 13-18-37A businessowner does not have a duty to warn invitees of open and obvious conditions on the premises of their business.WillamowskiSeneca 3/11/2019 3/11/2019 2019-Ohio-825
State v. Parsons 7-18-29Criminal Rule 33(A)(5) does not apply to changes in the law that occur subsequent to trial as they cannot have contributed to an error at law during the trial.WillamowskiHenry 3/11/2019 3/11/2019 2019-Ohio-824
State v. Lucius 8-18-31Sentence to maximum consecutive prison terms was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law.ShawLogan 3/4/2019 3/4/2019 2019-Ohio-741
Mousa v. Saad 9-18-12If a party violates R.C. 3105.171(E)(3) by failing to disclose assets, the trial court may use the remedy in R.C. 3105.171(E)(5) to compensate the other party. If a party to a divorce commits financial misconduct in violation of R.C. 3105.171(E)(4), the trial court may use the remedies in R.C. 3105.171(E)(4) to compensate the other party.WillamowskiMarion 3/4/2019 3/4/2019 2019-Ohio-742
State v. Junod 10-18-08The trial court did not err in overruling Appellant’s motion for a mistrial. Appellant was not prejudiced by trial counsel’s errors or by the improper religious statements made by the prosecutor during closing arguments. Appellant’s conviction for Aggravated Robbery was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in finding that Appellant’s convictions for Kidnapping and Aggravated Robbery did not merge for purposes of sentencing. The trial court erred in ordering Appellant to pay court-appointed counsel fees without first determining Appellant’s ability to pay. ShawMercer 3/4/2019 3/4/2019 2019-Ohio-743
123