Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 163 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. T.K. 18AP-522Trial court erred in its evidentiary rulings permitting sheriff's deputy to testify about usual and appropriate conduct of pro se litigants outside protection order hearings but not permitting on relevance grounds testimony from a lawyer with more than three decades of relevant experience who sought to testify on matters relevant to T.K.'s likely mental state at the time of the incident leading to his conviction. Cause reversed and remanded for new trial.BrunnerFranklin 5/21/2019 5/21/2019 2019-Ohio-1967
Fendley v. Wright State Univ. 18AP-113The trial court misinterpreted the parties' contract and rendered a verdict against the manifest weight of the evidence when determining whether plaintiff was entitled to an advance notice of discharge.KlattFranklin 5/21/2019 5/21/2019 2019-Ohio-1963
State v. Womack 18AP-353Trial court did not err when it failed to merge counts because the counts referred to separate conduct.KlattFranklin 5/21/2019 5/21/2019 2019-Ohio-1964
State v. C.L.W. 18AP-658The trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant the appellee’s motion to seal the record of her criminal conviction because she did not wait three years from the date of her final discharge to file her motion.Beatty BluntFranklin 5/21/2019 5/21/2019 2019-Ohio-1965
State v. Henson 18AP-695Appellant's robbery convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.Luper SchusterFranklin 5/21/2019 5/21/2019 2019-Ohio-1966
State ex rel. Clift v. School Emps. Retirement Sys. 17AP-561The magistrate did not err in finding that relator's time off work while receiving workers' compensation benefits did not constitute "contributing service" for the purpose of determining when relator could file her application for School Employees Retirement System of Ohio disability benefits under R.C. 3309.01(D). Objections overruled; writ of mandamus denied.Luper SchusterFranklin 5/16/2019 5/16/2019 2019-Ohio-1896
Williams v. Natl. Assn. for the Advancement of Colored People 18AP-476The trial court did not err in granting the NAACP’s motion for summary judgment on Williams’ claims of breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory estoppel, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Additionally, the trial court erred in denying appellees’ motion for sanctions without first considering the motion. Luper SchusterFranklin 5/16/2019 5/16/2019 2019-Ohio-1897
State ex rel. Mercy Health v. Indus. Comm. 18AP-64Commission abused its discretion when it awarded TTD benefits to claimant without making a determination whether claimant abandoned the work force either by accepting the employer's oral, light duty job offer and failing to return to work as agreed or refusing the employer's oral offer of light duty work within claimant's physical capabilities. Objections sustained, writ of mandamus granted, and case remanded to the commission for further proceedings.SadlerFranklin 5/14/2019 5/14/2019 2019-Ohio-1859
Dunham v. Ervin 18AP-325Case dismissed; a dismissal without prejudice generally is not a final appealable order, so long as the claims dismissed can be refiled.KlattFranklin 5/14/2019 5/14/2019 2019-Ohio-1860
Jabr v. Consumer Cellular, Inc. 18AP-573The trial court did not err in granting appellee's Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss because the complaint did not set forth a cognizable claim against appellee.McGrathFranklin 5/14/2019 5/14/2019 2019-Ohio-1861