Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 251 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Brown v. Holiday Inn Express & Suites 17AP-477The trial court did not err in dismissing plaintiff's claims for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress because plaintiff did not file those claims within the one-year statute of limitations applicable to battery claims. However, the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff's claims for negligence and negligent supervision on statute-of-limitations grounds.KlattFranklin 8/16/2018 8/16/2018 2018-Ohio-3281
State v. Schadhauser 17AP-794, 17AP-795, 17AP-796The trial court did not err in granting ODRC’s motion for summary judgment.SchusterFranklin 8/16/2018 8/16/2018 2018-Ohio-3282
Filonenko v. Smock Constr., L.L.C. 17AP-854The trial court erred in concluding that the resolution of the underlying case mooted motions for sanctions brought pursuant to R.C. 2323.51 and Civ.R. 11.KlattFranklin 8/16/2018 8/16/2018 2018-Ohio-3283
Ghani v. Greenfield 17AP-478In a case where divorcing parents proved unable to cooperate with one another and one was less reasonable and less likely to respect the rights of the other, the court acted within the proper exercise of its discretion to name the more reasonable of the two the legal custodian and residential parent. The trial court did retain jurisdiction, even after the filing of the appeal, to enforce its decree and did not err in determining that one parent had not acted in obedience to the decree.BrunnerFranklin 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 2018-Ohio-3259
In re Z.C. 17AP-647Trial court's order granting permanent custody to Franklin County Children Services was fully in accord with the evidence. The child had visible injuries which initiated proceedings. Biologial father abandoned the child. Mother has serious mental health and drug abuse issues.TyackFranklin 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 2018-Ohio-3260
State v. Gibson 17AP-734The trial court erred when it failed to merge the offenses of abduction and unlawful sexual conduct with a minor for purposes of sentencing.SchusterFranklin 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 2018-Ohio-3261
State v. Ross 18AP-24, 18AP-25 & 18AP-26Appellate record does not support claim that appellant received additional prison time as a result of his conduct when he was still a juvenile.TyackFranklin 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 2018-Ohio-3262
17AP-664 Davis v. DavisWhen a party does not object to a magistrate's decision entered before the trial court and does not argue plain error on appeal, the party forfeits all arguments against that decision on appeal.BrunnerFranklin 8/9/2018 8/9/2018 2018-Ohio-3180
State v. Campbell 17AP-713Trial court did not err when it denied appellant's motion to suppress evidence of cocaine and heroin found by police in a warrantless search of appellant's person because police had a reasonable suspicion, based on specific, articulable facts, that appellant was engaged in illegal narcotics activity and may be armed and because the subsequent search of appellant's person, including a pat-down of his groin and buttocks area did not exceed the permissible scope of Terry search for weapons. Judgment affirmed.SadlerFranklin 8/9/2018 8/9/2018 2018-Ohio-3181
State v. Oloye 17AP-902Trial court acted properly in sustaining a motion to suppress as there was no probable cause to arrest the suspect.TyackFranklin 8/9/2018 8/9/2018 2018-Ohio-3182
12345678910...>>