|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State v. Poindexter
| 19AP-394 | Sufficient evidence supported the appellant's convictions for murder and related offenses, and those convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, where three eye witnesses identified the appellant as the perpetrator. The trial court did not err in denying the appellant's motion for mistrial, which alleged certain identification testimony was improperly admitted, since the appellant failed to show such an error prejudiced him or prevented him from having a fair trial. Judgment affirmed. | Brogan | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1499 |
|
State v. Burns
| 19AP-482 | Defendant's convictions for aggravated burglary, kidnapping, domestic violence, and violation of a protection order affirmed. The convictions were supported by sufficient evidence as to all elements of the offenses, and the trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal. Jury did not lose its way it choosing to find the victim's testimony credible, and its judgment was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Beatty Blunt | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1500 |
|
State ex rel. Franta v. Indus. Comm.
| 19AP-530 | Industrial commission's determination to deny relator PTD compensation due to relator's capability of sustained remunerative employment is supported by a physician's opinion addressing relator's psychological conditions. Because "some evidence" supports the commission's decision, relief in mandamus is inappropriate on the facts of the case. Writ of mandamus denied. | Brogan | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1501 |
|
Romanowich v. Solich Music & Piano Co.
| 20AP-33 | Trial court's decision finding the appellant's former attorney had the apparent and actual authority to settle the claims between appellant and appellee, and that the authority was not revoked, was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Brogan | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1502 |
|
Middle West Spirits, L.L.C. v. Gemini Vodka, Ltd.
| 20AP-118 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants' motion for sanctions without a hearing. | Luper Schuster | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1503 |
|
Zeller-401 FX TIC, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
| 20AP-334 | Appellants' failed to provide competent and probative evidence to support their requests for a reduction in the assessed value of the land portion of the property and for allocation of all improvements to be included as tax exempt under a community reinvestment area. Therefore, the decision by the court of common pleas to affirm the Board of Revision's denial of appellant's requests was not an abuse of discretion. | Dorrian | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1504 |
|
Bullard v. McDonald's
| 20AP-374 | The trial court did not err in sua sponte dismissing appellant's amended complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Judgment affirmed. | Luper Schuster | Franklin |
4/29/2021
|
4/29/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1505 |
|
Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
| 20AP-172 | The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellants cannot meet all three requirements for a writ of mandamus to issue because they did not pursue an adequate remedy at law. Judgment affirmed. | Luper Schuster | Franklin |
4/22/2021
|
4/22/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1414 |
|
State ex rel. Anderson v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. Bd.
| 19AP-293 | Respondent State Teachers Retirement System board did not abuse its discretion in denying retirement credit to claimant pursuant to R.C. 2207.53, where some evidence supported the board's determination that the claimant was of service on a full-time basis during the years for which claimant sought such credit. Petition of writ of mandamus denied. | Beatty Blunt | Franklin |
4/20/2021
|
4/20/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1378 |
|
State v. Moore
| 19AP-464 | Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion in limine and admitting Facebook evidence. Defendant's convictions for felonious assault were supported by both sufficient evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in replacing juror with alternate juror during deliberations or in denying defendant's motion for mistrial based on juror replacement. Trial counsel provided effective assistance of counsel. Trial court did not err in imposing sentence. | Klatt | Franklin |
4/20/2021
|
4/20/2021
| 2021-Ohio-1379 |
|