On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio launched an expanded news program – Court News Ohio – that features stories about the Ohio judicial system. This archived page on the Supreme Court’s website only displays case summaries that occurred before that date. Cases that were summarized on July 17 and thereafter can be found at www.courtnewsohio.gov.

Upcoming Cases

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

2010-2029.  State ex rel. Data Trace Information Servs., L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-753.
In Mandamus.  Writ granted in part and denied in part.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-753.pdf
Summary: Court Holds County Must Provide Digital Copies of Title Records at Actual Cost of Copying Data to Compact Discs

2011-0563.  Wimmer v. Pub. Util. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-757.
Public Utilities Commission, No. 09-777-EL-CSS.  Order affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-757.pdf

2011-0756.  Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallo, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-758.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 09-087.  Nicholas Matthew Gallo, Attorney Registration No. 0083226, is publicly reprimanded.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-758.pdf

2011-1506.  State ex rel. Davet v. Sutula, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-759.
Cuyahoga App. No. 96548, 2011-Ohio-2803.  Appeal dismissed in part and judgments affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-759.pdf

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Adobe PDF PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.