Monday, Dec. 27, 2010
2009-0627. DIRECTV, Inc. v. Levin, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-6279.
Franklin App. No. 08AP-32, 181 Ohio App.3d 92, 2009-Ohio-636. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed.
Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-6279.pdf
Summary: Ohio Law Imposing Sales Tax on Satellite TV But Not on Cable Does Not Violate U.S. Commerce Clause
2009-1998. Ward v. Summa Health Sys., Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-6275.
Summit App. No. 24567, 184 Ohio App.3d 254, 2009-Ohio-4859. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
O'Donnell, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-6275.pdf
2009-2106. Summerville v. Forest Park, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-6280.
Hamilton App. No. C-090708. Judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and cause remanded to the court of appeals.
Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-6280.pdf
Summary: Denial of Summary Judgment Based on Federal Qualified Immunity Is 'Final Appealable Order'
2010-1139. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Godles, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-6274.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 09-073. Michael J. Godles, Attorney Registration No. 0042398, is publicly reprimanded.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-6274.pdf
Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."
PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.