Tuesday, Oct. 12, 2010
2009-1363. Griffith v. Cleveland, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4905.
Franklin App. No. 08AP-964, 2009-Ohio-2854. Judgment of the court of appeals reversed.
Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., not participating.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-4905.pdf
Summary: Supreme Court Rules Wrongful Imprisonment Claims May Not Originate in Ohio Court of Claims
2009-1405. Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4907.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-A-1196. Decision reversed.
Brown, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, O'Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-4907.pdf
2009-1559. Pickaway Cty. Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. Cordray, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4908.
Franklin App. No. 08AP-1032, 183 Ohio App.3d 390, 2009-Ohio-3483. Judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and cause remanded to the court of appeals.
Preston, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, Acting C.J., concurs in judgment only.
Vernon L. Preston, J., of the Third Appellate District, sitting for Brown, C.J.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-4908.pdf
Summary: Ten Dollar Limit on Skill Game Prizes Does Not Violate Equal Protection Clauses of U.S., Ohio Constitutions
2009-1671. Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. Levin, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-4904.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-A-11. Decision reversed.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-4904.pdf
Summary: Private Property Leased For Profit to School Does Not Qualify for 'Public Schoolhouse' Tax Exemption
Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."
PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.