Get e-mail updates when this information changes. Sign up to Receive E-mail Updates     Click to subscribe to the Supreme Court of Ohio Opinion Summaries RSS Feed Subscribe to This Feed     Upcoming Cases

Columbus Attorney Indefinitely Suspended

2009-2260.  Columbus Bar Assn. v. Clovis, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1859.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 09-045.  Charles Brandt Clovis, Attorney Registration No. 0071950, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.
Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., not participating.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1859.pdf Adobe PDF Link opens new window.

(May 5, 2010) The Supreme Court of Ohio today indefinitely suspended the license of Columbus attorney Charles Brandt Clovis for failing to perform promised legal work for a client after accepting a $4,000 fee advance, and then failing to respond to the resulting disciplinary investigation.

In a 6-0 per curiam opinion, the Court adopted findings by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline that Clovis accepted the fee advance to prepare a clemency petition on behalf of a client’s incarcerated  husband but performed no work on the case for 16 months and failed to refund the unearned legal fees or return documents to the client despite her repeated requests that he do so. 

The Court agreed with the board’s conclusions that Clovis violated the state disciplinary rules that require attorneys to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client and that prohibit an attorney from charging a clearly excessive fee and engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the attorney’s fitness to practice law. The Court also found that by failing to answer repeated inquiries from the Columbus Bar Association in response to a grievance filed by his client, or to file an answer to the formal complaint lodged against him with the disciplinary board, Clovis also violated the state bar governance rules that require attorneys to assist or testify in a disciplinary investigation and to respond to a demand for information from disciplinary authorities. 

Chief Justice Eric Brown did not participate in the Court’s deliberations or decision in the case.

Contacts
Bruce A. Campbell, 614.340.2053, for Patricia Manton.

Charles Clovis, pro se, 513.224.7291.

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Requires Adobe Flash Player. Requires the free Adobe Flash Player.
View system requirements, download instructions, and download the free Adobe Flash Player.