Thursday, April 8, 2010
2008-0029 and 2009-0753. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Cincinnati, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1473.
Hamilton App. No. C-070166, 174 Ohio App.3d 89, 2007-Ohio-6332, and 2009-Ohio-1078. Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1473.pdf
2008-2183. Lambert v. Clancy, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1483.
Hamilton App. No. C-070600, 178 Ohio App.3d 403, 2008-Ohio-4905. Judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and cause remanded to the trial court.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1483.pdf
Summary: ‘Political Subdivision’ Immunity Applies When Public Officeholder Sued In His/Her Official Capacity
2009-1541. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Theisler, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1472.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 05-012. Charles W. Theisler, Attorney Registration No. 0062582, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio without credit for time served under the interim suspension imposed on October 27, 2005.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1472.pdf
Summary: Youngstown Attorney’s License Indefinitely Suspended
2009-1689. State ex rel. N.A. v. Cross, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-1471.
Medina App. No. 08CA0045-M. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
O'Donnell, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-1471.pdf
Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."
PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.