Get e-mail updates when this information changes. Sign up to Receive E-mail Updates     Click to subscribe to the Supreme Court of Ohio Opinion Summaries RSS Feed Subscribe to This Feed     Upcoming Cases

Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2010

2009-0064.  Meadows Dev., L.L.C. v. Champaign Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-249.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-B-595.  Decision reversed and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-249.pdf

2009-0849.  Toledo Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-253.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2008-B-2080.  Decision reversed and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-253.pdf

2009-1118.  State ex rel. Sullivan v. Ramsey, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-252.
Lucas App. No. L-09-1118, 2009-Ohio-2279.  Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-252.pdf

2009-1534.  Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. DiMartino, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-247.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 08-055.  The stay of the one-year suspension imposed on Dennis A. DiMartino, Attorney Registration No. 0039270, on July 18, 2007 is lifted, and the one-year suspension is reinstated.  In addition, in this case respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, to run concurrently with the one-year suspension.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2010/2010-Ohio-247.pdf
Summary: Youngstown Attorney Suspended

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Adobe PDF PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.