Click to subscribe to the Supreme Court of Opinion Summary RSS Feed | Upcoming Cases |

Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2009

Note: All opinions open as PDFs Adobe PDF in a new browser window Link opens new window..

2009-0608.  Presley v. Fraley, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-5255.
Franklin App. No. 08AP-767, 2009-Ohio-1558.  Discretionary appeal accepted, and judgment of the court of appeals reversed.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-5255.pdf

2009-0790.  Missig v. Cleveland Civ. Serv. Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-5256.
Cuyahoga App. No. 91699, 2009-Ohio-966.  Discretionary appeal accepted, judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-5256.pdf

2009-0949.  Feazel v. Mills, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-5257.
Butler App. Nos. CA2009-02-063 and CA2009-03-091.  Discretionary appeal accepted, judgment of the court of appeals vacated, and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Lanzinger, J., dissents.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-5257.pdf

Second Case Announcement

2009-1707.  State ex rel. Husted v. Brunner, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-5327.
In Mandamus.  Writ granted.
Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., concurs in Part II(C) of the opinion and in judgment.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.
Lanzinger, J., concurs in Part II(B) of the opinion and in judgment.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-5327.pdf
Summary: Supreme Court Grants Writ, Orders Husted Treated as Montgomery County Resident

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Adobe PDF PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.